Patrick Zahraj and Govind Nanda will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on BAKER MCKENZIE. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Zahraj who should win in 3 sets.
Patrick Zahraj -> 1.68
Govind Nanda -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Zahraj vs. Govind Nanda
There is no head to head record between Patrick Zahraj and Govind Nanda since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Patrick Zahraj
32 - 24win/loss
587
587
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-24 | 9-3 | 17-15 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 587 (career-high), the German reached the qualifications after beating Quinn Vandecasteele 6-2 4-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, The German defeated Vandecasteele (6-2 4-6 7-5). During the match, Zahraj scored 108 points vs Vandecasteele’s 94. Zahraj was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zahraj bagged 3 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Patrick Zahraj lost the serve 7 times and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Zahraj put 59% of his first serves in, winning 57% (35/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Vandecasteele 9 times after converting 64% of his break points (9/14).
Zahraj has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (98-72). 9-3 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Zahraj has an aggregate15-11 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Patrick’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Klosters.
Patrick has a compiled 32-24 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Patrick has never competed in this tournament before.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-9 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 797, the American reached the qualifications after beating Bor Artnak 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Artnak (6-4 6-2). During the match Nanda scored 73 points vs Artnak’s 57. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Nanda blasted 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Govind Nanda lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Nanda put 63% of his first serves in, winning 66% (29/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. Govind broke Artnak 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Govind’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Lakewood.
Govind has a compiled 16-9 win-loss record in 2024, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zahraj | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 18 |
| Pts | 108-94 | 73-57 |
| Total Points | 202 | 130 |
| Winners | 35 | 29 |
| %Winners | 32% | 40% |
Both Zahraj and Nanda played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Patrick Zahraj lost 1 set while Govind Nanda hasn’t conceded a set so far. Zahraj has played 1 set more than Nanda (3 vs 2). Therefore, Zahraj played 12 games more than Nanda. Patrick scored 35 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Nanda blasted 29 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zahraj | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 61/104 | 44/70 |
| %1st in | 59% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 35/61 | 29/44 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 13/26 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 50% |
Zahraj made 3 aces . Nanda recorded 4 aces . Zahraj won 57% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Nanda won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zahraj | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 5 |
| Converted | 9/14 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 64% | 63% |
| Conceded | 21 | 9 |
| Saved | 14 | 7 |
| % Saved | 67% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 2 |
Patrick broke his opponent 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Zahraj dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Nanda broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Govind conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zahraj | |||
| Q1 Vandecasteele | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 108-94 | 108-94 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 61/104 | 61/104 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 21/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 9 | 9 | |
| Converted | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 21 | 21 | |
| Saved | 14/21 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
| Nanda | |||
| Q1 Artnak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 73-57 | 73-57 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/44 | 29/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 13/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karue SellSell – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Christian LangmoLangmo (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-1) – H2H and prediction