Sebastian Eriksson and Lukas Neumayer will play each other in the qualifications of the Braga Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Neumayer who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lukas Neumayer is the pick to win this match.
Lukas Neumayer -> 1.12
Sebastian Eriksson -> 5.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sebastian Eriksson vs. Lukas Neumayer
There is no head to head record between Sebastian Eriksson and Lukas Neumayer since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sebastian Eriksson
22 - 19win/loss
862
854
LLLLWLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-23 | 1-4 | 18-14 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Sebastian got to the qualifications after beating Andrea Picchione 6-4 2-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Picchione, Eriksson had a free pass after Picchione retired on a 6-4 2-1 . scoreline.
Eriksson has a losing match record in the last 3 years having won 49% of his matches (28-29). 18-13 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Eriksson has an aggregate22-17 record in the last 3 years on clay.
Eriksson’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Lambermont.
Eriksson has an overall 22-19 win-loss record in 2024, 18-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braga Challenger
Sebastian has never competed in this tournament before.
Lukas Neumayer
29 - 27win/loss
226
206
LWWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-32 | 2-2 | 38-29 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-32 | 2-1 | 38-28 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-26 | 12-4 | 41-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-25 | 8-10 | 16-14 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 270, the Austrian reached the qualifications after defeating Kilian Feldbausch 6-2 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Lukas defeated Feldbausch (6-2 3-6 6-3). During the match Neumayer scored 112 points vs Feldbausch’s 104. Lukas was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Neumayer scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Lukas Neumayer lost the serve 4 times and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Neumayer put 61% of his first serves in, winning 55% (36/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (23/42) on the 2nd serve. Neumayer broke Feldbausch 6 times after converting 33% of his break points (6/18).
The Austrian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Telfs and the Tulln Challenger.
Neumayer has an aggregate 29-27 win-loss record in 2024, 27-24 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Eriksson | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 26 |
| Pts | 39-33 | 112-104 |
| Total Points | 72 | 216 |
| Winners | 15 | 36 |
| %Winners | 38% | 32% |
Both Eriksson and Neumayer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Lukas Neumayer conceded 1 set while Sebastian Eriksson hasn’t conceded a set so far. Talking about their workload, Eriksson and Neumayer have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Eriksson played 13 games less than Neumayer. Sebastian scored 15 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Neumayer recorded 36 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Eriksson | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 25/32 | 65/107 |
| %1st in | 78% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 15/25 | 36/65 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 55% |
| 2nd pts | 4/7 | 23/42 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 55% |
Eriksson didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Neumayer managed to score 1 ace . Eriksson won 60% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Neumayer won 55% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Eriksson | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 6/18 |
| % Converted | 57% | 33% |
| Conceded | 2 | 17 |
| Saved | 0 | 13 |
| % Saved | 0% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Eriksson broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Eriksson conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Lukas broke his opponent 6 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Austrian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Eriksson | |||
| Q1 Picchione |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 39-33 | 39-33 | |
| Total points | 72 | 72 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 25/32 | 25/32 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Neumayer | |||
| Q1 Feldbausch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 112-104 | 112-104 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 65/107 | 65/107 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/65 | 36/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/42 | 23/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/18 | 6/18 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
| Saved | 13/17 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 76% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWW
LWWWWLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Christian GarinGarin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Joao DominguesDomingues (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco RochaRocha – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
