Bernard Tomic and Edas Butvilas will fight against each other in the quarter of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edas Butvilas who should win in 3 sets.
Edas Butvilas -> 1.81
Bernard Tomic -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Edas Butvilas
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Edas Butvilas since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
41 - 21win/loss
232
17
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-21 | 29-15 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 232, the Australian reached the quarter after beating Denis Kudla 6-4 2-6 7-6(3) and Naoki Nakagawa 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Tomic had a good straight sets win against Nakagawa (6-1 6-3). During the match, Tomic scored 65 points vs Nakagawa’s 42. Bernard was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tomic fired 4 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Bernard Tomic was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Nakagawa 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has lost 1 set in this competition to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Tomic has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (248-193). 29-15 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tomic has a compiled 165-100 record in the last years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Chennai,M25 Xalapa and M25 Tulsa.
Tomic has a composed 41-21 win-loss record in 2024, 29-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Edas Butvilas
49 - 20win/loss
365
365
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48-20 | 23-10 | 25-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 9-9 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 365 (career-high), Edas got to the quarter after defeating Sawyer Severance 6-1 6-0, James Kent Trotter 6-2 2-6 7-5 and Tristan Schoolkate 7-6(7) 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Lithuanian defeated Kent Trotter (6-2 2-6 7-5). During the match Butvilas scored 86 points vs Kent Trotter’s 83. Butvilas was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Butvilas fired 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Edas Butvilas lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Butvilas put 56% of his first serves in, winning 65% (31/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (20/38) on the 2nd serve. The Lithuanian broke Kent Trotter 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Lithuanian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion,M15 Kursumlijska Banja,M25 La Nucia and Nova.
The Lithuanian has an overall 48-20 win-loss record in 2024, 23-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Edas has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Butvilas |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 47 | 64 |
| Pts | 174-154 | 223-182 |
| Total Points | 328 | 405 |
| Winners | 66 | 87 |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% |
Tomic played 2 matches while Butvilas competed in 3 matches. Butvilas started his run from the qualifications while Tomic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Bernard Tomic dropped 1 set, while Edas Butvilas conceded 1 set. Tomic has played 2 set(s) less than Butvilas (5 vs 7). Therefore, Tomic played 17 games less than Butvilas. Tomic scored 66 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Edas bagged 87 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Butvilas |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 83/159 | 118/203 |
| %1st in | 52% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 66/83 | 87/118 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 35/76 | 44/85 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 52% |
Tomic fired 12 aces (6 per match). Butvilas managed to score 17 aces (5.7 per match). Tomic won 80% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Butvilas won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Butvilas |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 13 |
| Converted | 8/21 | 13/24 |
| % Converted | 38% | 54% |
| Conceded | 21 | 13 |
| Saved | 16 | 7 |
| % Saved | 76% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Tomic broke his opponents 8 times with a 38% conversion rate. Bernard dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. The Lithuanian broke his opponents 13 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Lithuanian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | ||||
| R1 Kudla | R2 Nakagawa | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 7-63 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 16 | 47 | |
| pts | 109-112 | 65-42 | 174-154 | |
| Total points | 221 | 107 | 328 | |
| Winners | 43 | 23 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 56/116 | 27/43 | 83/159 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 63% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 43/56 | 23/27 | 66/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 85% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/60 | 9/16 | 35/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 56% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/12 | 8/21 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 42% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 19 | 2 | 21 | |
| Saved | 15/19 | 1/2 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 50% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Butvilas | |||||
| Q1 Severance | Q3 Rybakov | R1 Kent | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-72 7-5 7-5 | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 37 | 28 | 78 | |
| pts | 53-20 | – | 86-83 | 139-103 | |
| Total points | 73 | 0 | 169 | 242 | |
| Winners | 18 | 31 | 49 | ||
| %Winners | 34% | 0% | 36% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 7 | ||
| 1st in | 19/38 | / | 48/86 | 67/124 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 0% | 56% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | / | 31/48 | 49/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 0% | 65% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | / | 20/38 | 29/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 0% | 53% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | ||
| Converted | 6/9 | / | 5/9 | 11/18 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 0% | 56% | 61% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | ||
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/ | 2/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 33% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – (0-2) – H2H and prediction