Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Mackenzie Mcdonald will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 10:30 am on COURT B. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mackenzie Mcdonald who should win in 3 sets.
Mackenzie Mcdonald -> 1.44
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Mackenzie Mcdonald
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Mackenzie Mcdonald since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
34 - 27win/loss
134
134
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-27 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 134 (career-high), the reached the semifinal after defeating Kasidit Samrej 6-4 6-3, Daniel Evans 6-4 7-5 and Adam Walton 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, The had a good straight sets win against Walton (6-4 6-4). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 63 points vs Walton’s 51. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 11 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The broke Walton twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (125-91). 34-20 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed104-66 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has an aggregate 34-27 win-loss record in 2024, 34-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
Mackenzie Mcdonald
13 - 19win/loss
172
37
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-19 | 7-9 | 0-4 | 1-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-30 | 23-15 | 0-6 | 4-3 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 16-16 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-26 | 15-12 | 12-5 | 9-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-16 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, the American got to the semifinal after defeating Thanapet Chanta 6-3 6-1, Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-2 and Gabriel Diallo 7-6(6) 6-3.
In the quarter, The American had a good straight sets win against Diallo (7-66 6-3). During the match Mcdonald scored 73 points vs Diallo’s 71. Mcdonald was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Mcdonald blasted 4 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mackenzie Mcdonald conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Mcdonald put 64% of his first serves in, winning 62% (32/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 86% (25/29) on the 2nd serve. Mcdonald broke Diallo once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Mackenzie has a compiled 13-19 win-loss record in 2024, 7-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 55 |
| Pts | 211-181 | 194-147 |
| Total Points | 392 | 341 |
| Winners | 94 | 79 |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Mcdonald played 3 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Mcdonald have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 6 games more than Mcdonald. The scored 94 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mackenzie managed to score 79 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 28 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 9.3 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 135/199 | 105/167 |
| %1st in | 68% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 94/135 | 79/105 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 35/64 | 43/62 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 69% |
Lam Coleman Wong scored 28 aces (9.3 per match). Mcdonald scored 19 aces (6.3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 70% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Mcdonald won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 10 |
| Converted | 11/23 | 10/25 |
| % Converted | 48% | 40% |
| Conceded | 17 | 6 |
| Saved | 13 | 5 |
| % Saved | 76% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Chak broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Chak dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. Mcdonald broke his opponents 10 times with a 40% conversion rate. Mcdonald conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Samrej | R2 Evans | 1/4 Walton | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 | 20 | 61 | |
| pts | 64-55 | 84-75 | 63-51 | 211-181 | |
| Total points | 119 | 159 | 114 | 392 | |
| Winners | 25 | 36 | 33 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% | 52% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 10 | 11 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 37/57 | 56/87 | 42/55 | 135/199 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 64% | 76% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 36/56 | 33/42 | 94/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 64% | 79% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 17/31 | 9/13 | 35/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 55% | 69% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/12 | 2/3 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 33% | 67% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 | 1 | 17 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 9/11 | 1/1 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 82% | 100% | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Mcdonald | |||||
| R1 Chanta | R2 Krueger | 1/4 Diallo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 22 | 55 | |
| pts | 58-39 | 63-37 | 73-71 | 194-147 | |
| Total points | 97 | 100 | 144 | 341 | |
| Winners | 25 | 22 | 32 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 35% | 44% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 4 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/51 | 24/35 | 52/81 | 105/167 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 69% | 64% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 22/24 | 32/52 | 79/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 92% | 62% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 10/11 | 25/29 | 43/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 91% | 86% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/11 | 1/5 | 10/25 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 36% | 20% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 4/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Gabriel DialloDiallo (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Rithvik Choudary Bollipalli/Arjun KadheChoudary Bollipalli/Arjun Kadhe – Gabriel Diallo/Seita WatanabeDiallo/Seita Watanabe (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Gabriel DialloDiallo (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (0-0) – H2H and prediction