Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Mackenzie Mcdonald will square off in the semifinal of the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 10:30 am on COURT B. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mackenzie Mcdonald who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mackenzie Mcdonald is the pick to win this match.
Mackenzie Mcdonald -> 1.44
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Mackenzie Mcdonald
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Mackenzie Mcdonald since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
34 - 27win/loss
159
128
LLWLWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-34 | 36-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 134 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong got to the semifinal after defeating Kasidit Samrej 6-4 6-3, Daniel Evans 6-4 7-5 and Adam Walton 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Walton (6-4 6-4). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 63 points vs Walton’s 51. Lam Coleman Wong was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 11 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lam Coleman Wong broke Walton twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Chak hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (125-91). 34-20 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed104-66 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has a composed 34-27 win-loss record in 2024, 34-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
Mackenzie Mcdonald
13 - 19win/loss
132
37
LWLWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-23 | 18-12 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-30 | 23-15 | 0-6 | 4-3 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 16-16 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-26 | 15-12 | 12-5 | 9-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-16 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, the American reached the semifinal after defeating Thanapet Chanta 6-3 6-1, Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-2 and Gabriel Diallo 7-6(6) 6-3.
In the quarter, Mackenzie had a good straight sets win against Diallo (7-66 6-3). During the match Mcdonald scored 73 points vs Diallo’s 71. Mackenzie was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Mcdonald managed to score 4 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mackenzie Mcdonald conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Mcdonald put 64% of his first serves in, winning 62% (32/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 86% (25/29) on the 2nd serve. Mackenzie broke Diallo once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mcdonald hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The American has a composed 13-19 win-loss record in 2024, 7-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 55 |
| Pts | 211-181 | 194-147 |
| Total Points | 392 | 341 |
| Winners | 94 | 79 |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Mcdonald played 3 matches. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Mcdonald have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 6 games more than Mcdonald. Lam Coleman Wong scored 94 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mcdonald recorded 79 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 28 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 9.3 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 135/199 | 105/167 |
| %1st in | 68% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 94/135 | 79/105 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 35/64 | 43/62 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 69% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 28 aces (9.3 per match). Mcdonald struck 19 aces (6.3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 70% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Mcdonald won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 10 |
| Converted | 11/23 | 10/25 |
| % Converted | 48% | 40% |
| Conceded | 17 | 6 |
| Saved | 13 | 5 |
| % Saved | 76% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. The surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. Mcdonald broke his opponents 10 times with a 40% conversion rate. Mackenzie conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Samrej |
R2 Evans |
1/4 Walton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 | 20 | 61 | |
| pts | 64-55 | 84-75 | 63-51 | 211-181 | |
| Total points | 119 | 159 | 114 | 392 | |
| Winners | 25 | 36 | 33 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% | 52% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 10 | 11 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 37/57 | 56/87 | 42/55 | 135/199 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 64% | 76% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 36/56 | 33/42 | 94/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 64% | 79% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 17/31 | 9/13 | 35/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 55% | 69% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/12 | 2/3 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 33% | 67% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 | 1 | 17 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 9/11 | 1/1 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 82% | 100% | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Mcdonald | |||||
| R1 Chanta |
R2 Krueger |
1/4 Diallo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 22 | 55 | |
| pts | 58-39 | 63-37 | 73-71 | 194-147 | |
| Total points | 97 | 100 | 144 | 341 | |
| Winners | 25 | 22 | 32 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 35% | 44% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 4 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/51 | 24/35 | 52/81 | 105/167 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 69% | 64% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 22/24 | 32/52 | 79/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 92% | 62% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 10/11 | 25/29 | 43/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 91% | 86% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/11 | 1/5 | 10/25 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 36% | 20% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 4/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWLL
LWLWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Gabriel DialloDiallo (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Rithvik Choudary Bollipalli/Arjun KadheChoudary Bollipalli/Arjun Kadhe – Gabriel Diallo/Seita WatanabeDiallo/Seita Watanabe (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Gabriel DialloDiallo (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
