James McCabe and Tung-Lin Wu will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 10:30 am on COURT A. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 3 sets.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.86
James McCabe -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James McCabe vs. Tung-Lin Wu
This will be the 2nd time that James McCabe and Tung-Lin Wu face off. The head to head is 1-0 for McCabe (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, McCabe won 6-1 6-7(1) 6-2 in the 1st round in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger back in April 2024.
James McCabe
47 - 27win/loss
259
258
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 52-32 | 45-26 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 296, James got to the semifinal after defeating Alejandro Moro Canas 6-4 7-6(2), Aslan Karatsev 6-1 6-4 and Arthur Cazaux 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.
In the quarter, James defeated Cazaux (7-64 4-6 6-3). During the match, McCabe scored 92 points vs Cazaux’s 91. James was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, McCabe made 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, James McCabe was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 75% (41/55) of his 1st serve and 67% (28/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. James broke Cazaux twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
McCabe has lost 1 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
McCabe has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (132-86). 40-21 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, McCabe has a compiled111-59 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Roehampton.
The Australian has a composed 47-27 win-loss record in 2024, 40-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
Tung-Lin Wu
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-25 | 31-23 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 314, Wu reached the semifinal after beating Yuttana Charoenphon 6-3 6-2, Aleksandre Bakshi 6-3 6-2, Marco Trungelliti 6-1 6-3, Denis Yevseyev 6-4 4-1 ret. and Dalibor Svrcina 6-1 6-1.
In the quarter, Tung-Lin had a good straight sets win against Svrcina (6-1 6-1). During the match Wu scored 58 points vs Svrcina’s 33. Wu was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Wu managed to score 2 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Tung-Lin Wu conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 84% of his first serves in, winning 76% (28/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (3/7) on the 2nd serve. Tung-Lin broke Svrcina 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tung-Lin started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 62% of the points he played.
Tung-Lin’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Bakersfield and the Gwangju Challenger.
Tung-Lin has an aggregate 30-22 win-loss record in 2024, 28-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | McCabe | Wu |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 7 | 11 |
Tot Games | 72 | 79 |
Pts | 236-205 | 287-182 |
Total Points | 441 | 469 |
Winners | 101 | 126 |
%Winners | 43% | 44% |
McCabe played 3 matches while Wu competed in 5 matches. Wu started his run from the qualifications while McCabe had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, James McCabe conceded 1 set while Tung-Lin Wu hasn’t lost a set so far. McCabe has played 4 set(s) less than Wu (7 vs 11). Therefore, McCabe played 7 games less than Wu. The Australian scored 101 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese blasted 126 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | McCabe | Wu |
---|---|---|
Aces | 23 | 14 |
Avg per match | 7.7 | 2.8 |
1st in | 135/221 | 166/223 |
%1st in | 61% | 74% |
1st pts | 101/135 | 126/166 |
%1st pts | 75% | 76% |
2nd pts | 55/86 | 40/57 |
%2nd pts | 64% | 70% |
McCabe bagged 23 aces (7.7 per match). Wu scored 14 aces (2.8 per match). McCabe won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | McCabe | Wu |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 20 |
Converted | 7/13 | 20/39 |
% Converted | 54% | 51% |
Conceded | 8 | 8 |
Saved | 5 | 6 |
% Saved | 63% | 75% |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
James broke his opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. James surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Tung-Lin broke his opponents 20 times with a 51% conversion rate. Tung-Lin conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
McCabe | |||||
R1 Moro | R2 Karatsev | 1/4 Cazaux | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-62 | 6-1 6-4 | 7-64 4-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 17 | 32 | 72 | |
pts | 83-71 | 61-43 | 92-91 | 236-205 | |
Total points | 154 | 104 | 183 | 441 | |
Winners | 34 | 26 | 41 | 101 | |
%Winners | 41% | 43% | 45% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 7 | 10 | 6 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
1st in | 45/64 | 35/60 | 55/97 | 135/221 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 58% | 57% | 61% | |
1st pts | 34/45 | 26/35 | 41/55 | 101/135 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 74% | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 16/25 | 28/42 | 55/86 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 64% | 67% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Converted | 2/7 | 3/3 | 2/3 | 7/13 | |
Converted % | 29% | 100% | 67% | 54% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 2/2 | 2/4 | 5 | |
Saved % | 50% | 100% | 50% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Wu | |||||||
Q1 Charoenphon | Q3 Bakshi | R1 Trungelliti | R2 Yevseyev | 1/4 Svrcina | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 4-1 ret. | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 79 | |
pts | 53-29 | 57-34 | 65-44 | 54-42 | 58-33 | 287-182 | |
Total points | 82 | 91 | 109 | 96 | 91 | 469 | |
Winners | 22 | 36 | 22 | 18 | 28 | 126 | |
%Winners | 42% | 63% | 34% | 33% | 48% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 26/42 | 45/53 | 33/45 | 25/39 | 37/44 | 166/223 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 85% | 73% | 64% | 84% | 74% | |
1st pts | 22/26 | 36/45 | 22/33 | 18/25 | 28/37 | 126/166 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 80% | 67% | 72% | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 14/16 | 6/8 | 5/12 | 12/14 | 3/7 | 40/57 | |
% 2nd pts | 88% | 75% | 42% | 86% | 43% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 20 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/3 | 6/13 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 20/39 | |
Converted % | 60% | 100% | 46% | 33% | 56% | 51% | |
Conceded | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 3/3 | 0/2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 6 | |
Saved % | – | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Gabriel DialloDiallo (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Rithvik Choudary Bollipalli/Arjun KadheChoudary Bollipalli/Arjun Kadhe – Gabriel Diallo/Seita WatanabeDiallo/Seita Watanabe (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Gabriel DialloDiallo (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (0-0) – H2H and prediction