Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Daniel Evans will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT B. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Evans is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Evans -> 1.39
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.81
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Daniel Evans
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Daniel Evans since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
32 - 27win/loss
134
134
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-27 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 134 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after defeating Kasidit Samrej 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Chak had a good straight sets win against Samrej (6-4 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 64 points vs Samrej’s 55. Chak was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 65% of his first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Samrej 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (123-91). 32-20 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled102-66 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled 32-27 win-loss record in 2024, 32-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
Daniel Evans
13 - 23win/loss
176
21
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-24 | 6-10 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-14 | 11-6 | 0-3 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 176, Evans reached the 2nd round after beating Khumoun Sultanov 4-6 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round against Sultanov, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-2). During the match Evans scored 89 points vs Sultanov’s 70. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Evans fired 5 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Daniel Evans was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (28/39) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Daniel broke Sultanov 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Evans has an aggregate 13-23 win-loss record in 2024, 6-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Evans |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 26 |
Pts | 64-55 | 89-70 |
Total Points | 119 | 159 |
Winners | 25 | 28 |
%Winners | 39% | 31% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Evans played 1 match. At the moment, Daniel Evans dropped 1 set while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Evans (2 vs 3). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 7 games less than Evans. Chak scored 25 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Evans managed to score 28 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Evans |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 5 |
Avg per match | 7 | 5 |
1st in | 37/57 | 39/75 |
%1st in | 65% | 52% |
1st pts | 25/37 | 28/39 |
%1st pts | 68% | 72% |
2nd pts | 9/20 | 20/36 |
%2nd pts | 45% | 56% |
Lam Coleman Wong struck 7 aces . Evans scored 5 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Evans won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Evans |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/8 | 6/10 |
% Converted | 63% | 60% |
Conceded | 5 | 9 |
Saved | 3 | 6 |
% Saved | 60% | 67% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Chak broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Evans broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Lam Coleman Wong | |||
R1 Samrej |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 64-55 | 64-55 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 37/57 | 37/57 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 9/20 | 9/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Evans | |||
R1 Sultanov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 89-70 | 89-70 | |
Total points | 159 | 159 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 39/75 | 39/75 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 28/39 | 28/39 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Vadym UrsuUrsu (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-67 7-5) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (7-69 6-0) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Yurii DzhavakianDzhavakian (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Maximilian MartererMarterer (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Thanapet ChantaChanta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Vadym UrsuUrsu (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Yurii DzhavakianDzhavakian (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (7-6(9) 6-0) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-6(7) 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Adam WaltonWalton (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-2) – H2H and prediction