Hamad Medjedovic and Borna Gojo will play each other in the 2nd round of the Orleans Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on CENTRAL ARENA. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.52
Borna Gojo -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hamad Medjedovic vs. Borna Gojo
This will be the 2nd time that Hamad Medjedovic and Borna Gojo fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Gojo (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Gojo won 7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 in the qualifications in at the U.S. Open back in 2023.
Hamad Medjedovic
27 - 16win/loss
114
102
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 35-21 | 9-6 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 135, Hamad reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexey Vatutin 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Hamad had a good straight sets win against Vatutin (6-4 6-2). During the match, Medjedovic scored 76 points vs Vatutin’s 59. The Serbian was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Medjedovic made 2 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Hamad Medjedovic was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hamad broke Vatutin 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Medjedovic has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (137-79). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Medjedovic has an overall18-15 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Hamad’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Istanbul Challenger.
The Serbian has an aggregate 27-16 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Hamad has never competed in this tournament before.
Borna Gojo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, the Croatian got to the 2nd round after beating Luca Van Assche 4-6 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round against Van Assche, Borna recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-1). During the match Gojo scored 94 points vs Van Assche’s 80. Borna was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Gojo buried his opponent with 20 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Borna Gojo was very efficient on serve to win 73% (40/55) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gojo broke Van Assche 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Borna has an aggregate 3-6 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Medjedovic | Gojo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 26 |
Pts | 76-59 | 94-80 |
Total Points | 135 | 174 |
Winners | 28 | 40 |
%Winners | 37% | 43% |
Both Medjedovic and Gojo played 1 match. At the moment, Borna Gojo lost 1 set while Hamad Medjedovic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Medjedovic has played 1 set(s) less than Gojo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Medjedovic played 8 games less than Gojo. Hamad scored 28 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Gojo blasted 40 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Medjedovic | Gojo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 20 |
Avg per match | 2 | 20 |
1st in | 38/50 | 55/79 |
%1st in | 76% | 70% |
1st pts | 28/38 | 40/55 |
%1st pts | 74% | 73% |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 13/24 |
%2nd pts | 75% | 54% |
Medjedovic managed to score 2 aces . Gojo struck 20 aces . Medjedovic won 74% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Medjedovic | Gojo |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/8 | 4/13 |
% Converted | 38% | 31% |
Conceded | 2 | 5 |
Saved | 2 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 80% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Serbian broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Serbian had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Borna broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Medjedovic | |||
R1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 76-59 | 76-59 | |
Total points | 135 | 135 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 38/50 | 38/50 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Gojo | |||
R1 Van |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 94-80 | 94-80 | |
Total points | 174 | 174 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 20 | 20 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 55/79 | 55/79 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 40/55 | 40/55 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Orleans Challenger
- Mark LajalLajal – Matteo MartineauMartineau (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (6-4 4-6 7-61) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Jonathan EyssericEysseric (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Norbert GombosGombos (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Robin BertrandBertrand – Martin DammDamm (2-6 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Richard GasquetGasquet (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (6-4 4-6 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Jonathan EyssericEysseric (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 6-7(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Matteo MartineauMartineau (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Harold MayotMayot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (1-0) – H2H and prediction