Bor Artnak and Tyler Zink will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bor Artnak who should win in 3 sets.
Bor Artnak -> 1.74
Tyler Zink -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Bor Artnak vs. Tyler Zink
There is no head to head record between Bor Artnak and Tyler Zink since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Bor Artnak
39 - 17win/loss
420
373
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-26 | 10-11 | 29-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-33 | 16-7 | 28-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 21-12 | 9-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 389, Artnak reached the qualifications after beating Peter Bertran 6-4 6-3 and Tyler Zink 7-6(3) 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Slovenian had a good straight sets win against Bertran (6-4 6-3). During the match, Artnak scored 72 points vs Bertran’s 57. Artnak was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Artnak made 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Bor Artnak lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Artnak put 65% of his first serves in, winning 63% (29/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Bor broke Bertran 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Artnak has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (104-63). 9-6 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Artnak has an overall34-19 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
Artnak’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Vrhnika,M15 Litija and M25 Brazzaville.
Artnak has a compiled 38-17 win-loss record in 2024, 9-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Bor has never competed in this tournament before.
Tyler Zink
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 609 (career-high), Tyler got to the qualifications after beating Bruno Kuzuhara 6-2 3-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Tyler defeated Kuzuhara (6-2 3-6 6-2). During the match Zink scored 92 points vs Kuzuhara’s 78. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Zink fired 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tyler Zink lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Zink put 57% of his first serves in, winning 71% (41/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. Tyler broke Kuzuhara 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Zink’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Rochester,M25 Southaven and M15 Huntsville.
Zink has a composed 24-8 win-loss record in 2024, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Artnak | Zink |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 25 |
Pts | 72-57 | 92-78 |
Total Points | 129 | 170 |
Winners | 29 | 41 |
%Winners | 40% | 45% |
Both Artnak and Zink played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tyler Zink conceded 1 set while Bor Artnak hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Artnak has played 1 set(s) less than Zink (2 vs 3). Therefore, Artnak played 6 games less than Zink. Bor scored 29 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Tyler scored 41 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Artnak | Zink |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 12 |
Avg per match | 5 | 12 |
1st in | 46/71 | 58/101 |
%1st in | 65% | 57% |
1st pts | 29/46 | 41/58 |
%1st pts | 63% | 71% |
2nd pts | 10/25 | 21/43 |
%2nd pts | 40% | 49% |
Artnak scored 5 aces . Zink made 12 aces . Artnak won 63% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Zink won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Artnak | Zink |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 4 |
Converted | 6/11 | 4/10 |
% Converted | 55% | 40% |
Conceded | 7 | 10 |
Saved | 3 | 8 |
% Saved | 43% | 80% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Bor broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Artnak lost his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. Zink broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Tyler conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Artnak | |||
Q1 Bertran | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 72-57 | 72-57 | |
Total points | 129 | 129 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 10/25 | 10/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Zink | |||
Q1 Kuzuhara | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 92-78 | 92-78 | |
Total points | 170 | 170 | |
Winners | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 58/101 | 58/101 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 41/58 | 41/58 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 21/43 | 21/43 | |
% 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Bernard TomicTomic (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Govind NandaNanda (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henry LiebermanLieberman – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction