Samuel Vincent Ruggeri and Hazem Naow will square off in the qualifications of the Orleans Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTRAL ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Samuel Vincent Ruggeri who should win in 3 sets.
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 1.74
Hazem Naow -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Samuel Vincent Ruggeri vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Samuel Vincent Ruggeri and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
43 - 28win/loss
252
252
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-31 | 12-6 | 26-20 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 275, the Italian reached the qualifications after defeating Antoine Hoang 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Samuel had a good straight sets win against Hoang (6-1 6-1). During the match, Vincent Ruggeri scored 56 points vs Hoang’s 30. The Italian was very aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vincent Ruggeri struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 75% (15/20) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Vincent Ruggeri broke Hoang 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Vincent Ruggeri has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 63% of his matches (182-109). 7-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Vincent Ruggeri has an aggregate11-9 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Italian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Milan Challenger.
Samuel has an aggregate 43-28 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 314, Hazem got to the qualifications after beating Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Naow had a good straight sets win against Gueymard Wayenburg (6-2 6-2). During the match Naow scored 62 points vs Gueymard Wayenburg’s 39. Hazem was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Naow scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Hazem Naow was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Naow broke Gueymard Wayenburg 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Naow’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Kish Island and M15 Metzingen.
Hazem has a compiled 39-20 win-loss record in 2024, 17-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Naow has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vincent Ruggeri | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 16 |
| Pts | 56-30 | 62-39 |
| Total Points | 86 | 101 |
| Winners | 15 | 24 |
| %Winners | 27% | 39% |
Both Vincent Ruggeri and Naow played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vincent Ruggeri and Naow have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vincent Ruggeri played 2 games less than Naow. The Italian scored 15 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, Naow fired 24 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vincent Ruggeri | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 20/41 | 33/56 |
| %1st in | 49% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 15/20 | 24/33 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 52% |
Vincent Ruggeri made 3 aces . Naow recorded 1 ace . Vincent Ruggeri won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vincent Ruggeri | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 43% | 63% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 7 |
| % Saved | 75% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Vincent Ruggeri broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Vincent Ruggeri dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Syrian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Hazem conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vincent Ruggeri | |||
| Q1 Hoang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-30 | 56-30 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 15/20 | 15/20 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Naow | |||
| Q1 Gueymard | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-39 | 62-39 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/56 | 33/56 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Jonathan EyssericEysseric (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Harold MayotMayot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PichlerPichler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-2) – H2H and prediction