Abedallah Shelbayh and Kyle Edmund will face off in the quarter of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.87
Abedallah Shelbayh -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Abedallah Shelbayh vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Abedallah Shelbayh and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Abedallah Shelbayh
33 - 26win/loss
232
181
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 37-32 | 18-13 | 10-11 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-32 | 27-15 | 7-7 | 5-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-7 | 17-5 | 3-1 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 7-8 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-4 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 193, the got to the quarter after beating Eliot Spizzirri 6-1 6-0 and Jack Anthrop 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The had a good straight sets win against Anthrop (6-4 6-4). During the match, Shelbayh scored 71 points vs Anthrop’s 65. Abedallah was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Shelbayh recorded 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Abedallah Shelbayh lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Shelbayh put 59% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the 2nd serve. Shelbayh broke Anthrop 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Abedallah hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Shelbayh has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (113-76). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Shelbayh has an aggregate16-10 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Shelbayh’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Little Rock Challenger and the Las Vegas Challenger.
Shelbayh has a compiled 33-25 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Kyle Edmund
32 - 20win/loss
350
14
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 417, Kyle reached the quarter after beating Adam Neff 3-6 6-2 6-4, Tyler Zink 7-6(6) 6-0, Jeff Wolf 6-1 7-6(4) and Dominic Stricker 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Stricker (6-3 6-3). During the match Edmund scored 62 points vs Stricker’s 46. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Edmund fired 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Kyle Edmund lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Edmund put 56% of his first serves in, winning 88% (30/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. Kyle broke Stricker 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Edmund started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Edmund’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
The Brit has a compiled 31-20 win-loss record in 2024, 17-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Kyle has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Shelbayh | Edmund |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
Tot Games | 33 | 84 |
Pts | 129-98 | 304-238 |
Total Points | 227 | 542 |
Winners | 52 | 110 |
%Winners | 40% | 36% |
Shelbayh played 2 matches while Edmund competed in 4 matches. Edmund started his run from the qualifications while Shelbayh had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kyle Edmund conceded 1 set while Abedallah Shelbayh hasn’t conceded a set so far. Shelbayh has played 5 set(s) less than Edmund (4 vs 9). Therefore, Shelbayh played 51 games less than Edmund. The scored 52 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit struck 110 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Shelbayh | Edmund |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 25 |
Avg per match | 3.5 | 6.3 |
1st in | 70/119 | 130/253 |
%1st in | 59% | 51% |
1st pts | 52/70 | 110/130 |
%1st pts | 74% | 85% |
2nd pts | 26/49 | 70/123 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 57% |
Shelbayh struck 7 aces (3.5 per match). Edmund recorded 25 aces (6.3 per match). Shelbayh won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Shelbayh | Edmund |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 13 |
Converted | 8/14 | 13/36 |
% Converted | 57% | 36% |
Conceded | 15 | 10 |
Saved | 14 | 7 |
% Saved | 93% | 70% |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Shelbayh conceded his serve once and he saved 93% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 13 times with a 36% conversion rate. Kyle conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
Shelbayh | ||||
R1 Spizzirri |
R2 Anthrop |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 20 | 33 | |
pts | 58-33 | 71-65 | 129-98 | |
Total points | 91 | 136 | 227 | |
Winners | 24 | 28 | 52 | |
%Winners | 41% | 39% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
1st in | 30/51 | 40/68 | 70/119 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 24/30 | 28/40 | 52/70 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 70% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 16/28 | 26/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 57% | 53% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 3/7 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 71% | 43% | 57% | |
Conceded | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
Saved | 8/8 | 6/7 | 14 | |
Saved % | 100% | 86% | 93% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Edmund | ||||||
Q1 Neff |
Q3 Zink |
R1 Wolf |
R2 Stricker |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | 7-66 6-0 | 6-1 7-64 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 84 | |
pts | 87-75 | 78-60 | 77-57 | 62-46 | 304-238 | |
Total points | 162 | 138 | 134 | 108 | 542 | |
Winners | 32 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 110 | |
%Winners | 37% | 29% | 32% | 48% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 25 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
1st in | 37/73 | 28/58 | 31/61 | 34/61 | 130/253 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 48% | 51% | 56% | 51% | |
1st pts | 32/37 | 23/28 | 25/31 | 30/34 | 110/130 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 82% | 81% | 88% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/30 | 20/30 | 10/27 | 70/123 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 67% | 67% | 37% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/10 | 3/12 | 4/6 | 13/36 | |
Converted % | 38% | 30% | 25% | 67% | 36% | |
Conceded | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 7 | |
Saved % | 50% | – | 75% | 75% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction