Laura Siegemund and Rebeka Masarova will fight against each other in the quarter of the Thailand Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 6:30 pm on Center Court. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laura Siegemund who should win in 3 sets.
Laura Siegemund -> 1.79
Rebeka Masarova -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Laura Siegemund vs. Rebeka Masarova
There is no head to head record between Laura Siegemund and Rebeka Masarova since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Laura Siegemund
21 - 16win/loss
83
27
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-21 | 16-11 | 11-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-17 | 23-13 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 3-5 | 15-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-14 | 7-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-9 | 11-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, Siegemund reached the quarter after defeating Alycia Parks 6-4 6-3 and Xiyu Wang 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(1).
In the 2nd round, Siegemund defeated Wang (7-63 4-6 7-61). During the match, Siegemund scored 115 points vs Wang’s 112. Laura was exceptionally aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Talking about the service games, Siegemund was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 8 double faults. Laura Siegemund lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Siegemund put 75% of her first serves in, winning 65% (54/83) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. Laura broke Wang 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Laura has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 52% of the points she played.
Siegemund has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (261-174). 9-6 on hard in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Siegemund has an aggregate 87-75 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The German has an overall 21-16 win-loss record in 2024, 9-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hua Hin
Siegemund has never competed in this tournament before.
Rebeka Masarova
25 - 27win/loss
149
62
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-29 | 11-14 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-23 | 16-11 | 10-5 | 9-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-26 | 8-8 | 21-15 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-13 | 27-7 | 14-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119, Masarova reached the quarter after defeating Anna Bondar 3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 and Xinyu Wang 7-6(6) 3-6 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Masarova defeated Wang (7-66 3-6 7-5).During the match Masarova scored less points (8) than Wang. In fact, the world no. 99 won 116 points vs Wang’s. That means that Masarova was more focused during the important points. Rebeka was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Masarova recorded 6 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Rebeka Masarova lost the serve 5 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Masarova put 63% of her first serves in, winning 62% (43/69) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (20/40) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Wang 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Rebeka has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points she played.
Masarova’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the La Bisbal D’Emporda.
Rebeka has a compiled 25-27 win-loss record in 2024, 11-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siegemund | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 68 |
| Pts | 193-178 | 231-232 |
| Total Points | 371 | 463 |
| Winners | 86 | 89 |
| %Winners | 45% | 39% |
Both Siegemund and Masarova played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Laura Siegemund dropped 1 set, while Rebeka Masarova surrendered 2 sets. Siegemund has played 1 set(s) less than Masarova (5 vs 6). Therefore, Siegemund played 13 games less than Masarova. Laura scored 86 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Rebeka scored 89 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siegemund | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 138/186 | 141/217 |
| %1st in | 74% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 86/138 | 89/141 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 15/48 | 39/76 |
| %2nd pts | 31% | 51% |
Siegemund fired 2 aces (1 per match). Masarova struck 13 aces (6.5 per match). Siegemund won 62% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 31% of the points. On the other side, Masarova won 63% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siegemund | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 10 |
| Converted | 12/26 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 46% | 48% |
| Conceded | 25 | 24 |
| Saved | 15 | 14 |
| % Saved | 60% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 10 |
The German broke her opponents 12 times with a 46% conversion rate. Laura lost her serve 10 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Masarova broke her opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. Masarova conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 58% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siegemund | ||||
| R1 Parks | R2 Wang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 7-63 4-6 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 36 | 55 | |
| pts | 78-66 | 115-112 | 193-178 | |
| Total points | 144 | 227 | 371 | |
| Winners | 32 | 54 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 47% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 55/75 | 83/111 | 138/186 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 75% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 32/55 | 54/83 | 86/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 65% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/20 | 10/28 | 15/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 25% | 36% | 31% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 7/15 | 5/11 | 12/26 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 45% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 13 | 25 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 7/13 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 54% | 61% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Masarova | ||||
| R1 Bondar | R2 Wang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-62 7-5 | 7-66 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | 68 | |
| pts | 115-108 | 116-124 | 231-232 | |
| Total points | 223 | 240 | 463 | |
| Winners | 46 | 43 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 37% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 72/108 | 69/109 | 141/217 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 63% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 46/72 | 43/69 | 89/141 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 62% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 20/40 | 39/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 50% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/13 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 38% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 10 | 24 | |
| Saved | 9/14 | 5/10 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 50% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Tennis Scores in Hua Hin
- Ryota TanumaTanuma – Issei OkamuraOkamura (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Mick VeldheerVeldheer (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Takuto NikiNiki – Hiroyasu EharaEhara (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jumpei YamasakiYamasaki – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mai HontamaHontama – Arianne HartonoHartono (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana FettFett – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (2-1) – H2H and prediction