Dominic Stricker and Kyle Edmund will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Stricker who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dominic Stricker is the pick to win this match.
Dominic Stricker -> 1.39
Kyle Edmund -> 2.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominic Stricker vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Dominic Stricker and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dominic Stricker
5 - 10win/loss
327
88
WLWLLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-10 | 4-3 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-25 | 8-3 | 8-5 | 14-13 | 6-3 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 37-25 | 2-5 | 8-7 | 22-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-19 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 14-7 | 2-2 | 4-2 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 339, Dominic got to the 2nd round after beating Ryan Peniston 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, Dominic had a good straight sets win against Peniston (6-3 7-5). During the match, Stricker scored 74 points vs Peniston’s 57. Dominic was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stricker fired 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dominic Stricker lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Stricker put 59% of his first serves in, winning 65% (24/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. Dominic broke Peniston 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Stricker has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (112-84). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Stricker has a compiled52-31 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Swiss has a composed 5-9 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Kyle Edmund
31 - 20win/loss
366
14
LWWWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-21 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 18-7 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 417, the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Adam Neff 3-6 6-2 6-4, Tyler Zink 7-6(6) 6-0 and Jeff Wolf 6-1 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, Edmund had a good straight sets win against Wolf (6-1 7-64). During the match Edmund scored 77 points vs Wolf’s 57. Kyle was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Edmund scored 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Kyle Edmund was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kyle broke Wolf 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
The Brit’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
Kyle has a composed 30-20 win-loss record in 2024, 16-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stricker | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 66 |
| Pts | 74-57 | 242-192 |
| Total Points | 131 | 434 |
| Winners | 24 | 80 |
| %Winners | 32% | 33% |
Stricker played 1 match while Edmund competed in 3 matches. Edmund started his run from the qualifications while Stricker had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kyle Edmund dropped 1 set while Dominic Stricker hasn’t conceded a set so far. Stricker has played 5 set(s) less than Edmund (2 vs 7). Therefore, Stricker played 45 games less than Edmund. Stricker scored 24 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit recorded 80 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stricker | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 37/63 | 96/192 |
| %1st in | 59% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 24/37 | 80/96 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 60/96 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 63% |
Stricker struck 4 aces . Edmund made 19 aces (6.3 per match). Stricker won 65% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stricker | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 9 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 9/30 |
| % Converted | 56% | 30% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 40% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Stricker broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Swiss surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Edmund broke his opponents 9 times with a 30% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stricker | |||
| R1 Peniston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 74-57 | 74-57 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/63 | 37/63 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Edmund | |||||
| Q1 Neff |
Q3 Zink |
R1 Wolf |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | 7-66 6-0 | 6-1 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 19 | 20 | 66 | |
| pts | 87-75 | 78-60 | 77-57 | 242-192 | |
| Total points | 162 | 138 | 134 | 434 | |
| Winners | 32 | 23 | 25 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 29% | 32% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 4 | 6 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 37/73 | 28/58 | 31/61 | 96/192 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 48% | 51% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 23/28 | 25/31 | 80/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 82% | 81% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/30 | 20/30 | 60/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 67% | 67% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/10 | 3/12 | 9/30 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 30% | 25% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 75% | 125% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLLWLWWL
LWWWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Ethan QuinnQuinn (5-7 7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Alexander BernardBernard (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Andres AndradeAndrade (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
