Nicolas Moreno De Alboran and Henri Squire will face off in the 2nd round of the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nicolas Moreno De Alboran who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nicolas Moreno De Alboran is the pick to win this match.
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran -> 1.68
Henri Squire -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicolas Moreno De Alboran vs. Henri Squire
There is no head to head record between Nicolas Moreno De Alboran and Henri Squire since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
35 - 30win/loss
109
109
LWWWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-35 | 21-12 | 27-19 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-30 | 25-16 | 10-8 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-20 | 8-2 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-20 | 22-11 | 22-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-12 | 14-8 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156, Moreno De Alboran reached the 2nd round after defeating Federico Arnaboldi 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, Nicolas had a good straight sets win against Arnaboldi (6-1 6-3). During the match, Moreno De Alboran scored 59 points vs Arnaboldi’s 35. Moreno De Alboran was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Moreno De Alboran struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Nicolas Moreno De Alboran was very efficient on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Spaniard broke Arnaboldi 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Moreno De Alboran has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (227-136). 22-17 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Moreno De Alboran has an aggregate100-61 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Nicolas’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Brasov Challenger and the Liberec Challenger.
Nicolas has a compiled 35-30 win-loss record in 2024, 22-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Moreno De Alboran has never competed in this tournament before.
Henri Squire
38 - 27win/loss
176
169
LWLWWLLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Henri got to the 2nd round after defeating Francesco Passaro 6-4 7-6(6).
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Passaro (6-4 7-66). During the match Squire scored 77 points vs Passaro’s 73. Henri was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Squire struck 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Henri Squire was very effective on serve to win 75% (41/55) of his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Passaro twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Hamburg Challenger where he beat Clement Chidekh in the final 6-4 6-2.
Squire has an overall 38-27 win-loss record in 2024, 21-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moreno De Alboran | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 |
| Pts | 59-35 | 77-73 |
| Total Points | 94 | 150 |
| Winners | 21 | 41 |
| %Winners | 36% | 53% |
Both Moreno De Alboran and Squire played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Moreno De Alboran and Squire have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Moreno De Alboran played 7 games less than Squire. Nicolas scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Henri scored 41 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moreno De Alboran | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 11 |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 55/80 |
| %1st in | 60% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 41/55 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 13/25 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 52% |
Moreno De Alboran recorded 3 aces . Squire managed to score 11 aces . Moreno De Alboran won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moreno De Alboran | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Moreno De Alboran broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Spaniard pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The German broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Squire conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moreno De Alboran | |||
| R1 Arnaboldi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-35 | 59-35 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Squire | |||
| R1 Passaro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 77-73 | 77-73 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 55/80 | 55/80 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 41/55 | 41/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 13/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWWL
LWLWWLLWLL Tennis Scores in Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – David PichlerPichler (6-74 7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-74 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Cem IlkelIlkel (5-7 6-4 7-61) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Federico CoriaCoria (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (5-7 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-64 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Tim HandelHandel (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel Masur/Lucas MiedlerMasur/Lucas Miedler – Neil Oberleitner/Joel SchwaerzlerOberleitner/Joel Schwaerzler (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Sandro KoppKopp – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Jakob Schnaitter/Mark WallnerSchnaitter/Mark Wallner – Maximilian Neuchrist/Tristan-Samuel WeissbornNeuchrist/Tristan-Samuel Weissborn (6-2 7-67) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-65 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Vilius GaubasGaubas (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Cem IlkelIlkel (5-7 6-4 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Federico CoriaCoria (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Tim HandelHandel (7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Carlos TabernerTaberner (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Dennis NovakNovak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-0) – H2H and prediction
