Mitchell Krueger and Yasutaka Uchiyama will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Hangzhou Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.727
Yasutaka Uchiyama -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Yasutaka Uchiyama
This will be the 2nd time that Mitchell Krueger and Yasutaka Uchiyama square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Uchiyama (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Uchiyama won 7-6(3) 6-3 in the 1st round in the Granby Challenger back in 2018.
Mitchell Krueger
39 - 22win/loss
140
135
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-22 | 28-12 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 140, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Nicolas Mejia 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Krueger had a good straight sets win against Mejia (6-4 6-2). During the match, Krueger scored 60 points vs Mejia’s 45. Mitchell was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mitchell Krueger was very effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 79% (15/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Krueger broke Mejia 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Krueger has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (300-279). 28-12 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has an overall 211-170 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4 and the Little Rock Challenger where he beat Yuta Shimizu in the final 6-3 6-4.
The American has a compiled 39-22 win-loss record in 2024, 28-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hangzhou
Krueger has never competed in this tournament before.
Yasutaka Uchiyama
26 - 16win/loss
160
78
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-16 | 22-12 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-24 | 27-22 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-21 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-26 | 9-13 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, the Japanese got to the qualifications after defeating Maxime Cressy 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Uchiyama had a good straight sets win against Cressy (6-4 6-0). During the match Uchiyama scored 58 points vs Cressy’s 33. Uchiyama was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Uchiyama blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Yasutaka Uchiyama was quite efficient on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Uchiyama broke Cressy 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Busan Challenger where he overcame Seong Chan Hong in the final 7-6(4) 6-3 and the Zhangjiagang Challenger where he defeated Mark Lajal in the final 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2.
Yasutaka has an aggregate 26-16 win-loss record in 2024, 22-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Uchiyama |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 16 |
| Pts | 60-45 | 58-33 |
| Total Points | 105 | 91 |
| Winners | 24 | 23 |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% |
Both Krueger and Uchiyama played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Krueger and Uchiyama have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Krueger played 2 games more than Uchiyama. Krueger scored 24 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Yasutaka struck 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Uchiyama |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 33/52 | 25/39 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 23/25 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 92% |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 79% | 64% |
Krueger blasted 5 aces . Uchiyama struck 7 aces . Krueger won 73% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Uchiyama won 92% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Uchiyama |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 57% |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Japanese was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Mejia | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 60-45 | 60-45 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/52 | 33/52 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 15/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Uchiyama | |||
| Q1 Cressy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-33 | 58-33 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 25/39 | 25/39 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 23/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Hugo GastonGaston (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction