Nino Serdarusic and Cem Ilkel will face off in the qualifications of the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nino Serdarusic who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Nino Serdarusic is the pick to win this match.
Nino Serdarusic -> 1.37
Cem Ilkel -> 2.93

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Nino Serdarusic vs. Cem Ilkel

This will be the 5th time that Nino Serdarusic and Cem Ilkel square off. The head to head is 3-1 for Ilkel (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.

The last time that they played, Ilkel won 6-2 6-4 in the 1st round in the Vilnius Challenger back in 2023.

Nino Serdarusic

Nino Serdarusic

20 - 21win/loss

Hard
1-2
I Hard
0-1
Clay
19-18
Rank
450
High
167
WLWLLLWWLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 20-21 1-2 19-18 0-1 0-0 0-0
2023 30-33 0-4 26-23 4-6 0-0 0-0
2022 27-34 6-6 17-20 4-7 0-1 0-0
2021 26-33 0-0 23-25 3-8 0-0 0-0
2020 17-14 3-2 6-5 8-7 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 450, Serdarusic got to the qualifications after beating Lucas Miedler 6-3 7-6(3).

In the qualifications, Nino had a good straight sets win against Miedler (6-3 7-63). During the match, Serdarusic scored 79 points vs Miedler’s 68. Serdarusic was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.

Regarding the service games, Serdarusic bagged 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Nino Serdarusic lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Serdarusic put 79% of his first serves in, winning 68% (43/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. Serdarusic broke Miedler twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).

Serdarusic has winning record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (348-291). 19-18 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Serdarusic has a compiled 298-209 match record in the last years on clay.

Serdarusic’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.

Nino has an overall 20-21 win-loss record in 2024, 19-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger

Nino has never competed in this tournament before.

Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Serdarusic's Record

Cem Ilkel

Cem Ilkel

13 - 20win/loss

Hard
6-10
I Hard
5-6
Clay
2-4
Rank
475
High
144
WLLWWLWLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 13-20 6-10 2-4 5-6 0-0 0-0
2023 33-29 6-10 0-4 27-14 0-1 0-0
2022 18-16 2-4 0-3 16-7 0-2 0-0
2021 38-29 17-9 13-11 8-7 0-1 0-1
2020 13-15 2-3 1-7 10-5 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 475, Ilkel got to the qualifications after defeating Martin Klizan 7-6(4) ret..

In the qualifications against Klizan, Cem had a free pass after Klizan retired on a 7-64 . scoreline.

Ilkel has an overall 13-20 win-loss record in 2024, 2-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Ilkel's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament

N.Serdarusic
C.Ilkel
1h:31
1h:31
Time on court​
1h:06
1h:06
1h:31
1h:31
Last match​
1h:06
1h:06
1
1
Match played
1
1
22
22
Games Played​
13
13
2
2
Set played​​
2
2
79
79
Total points​
49
49
79
79
Avg point​
49
49
43
43
Winners
15
15
43
43
Avg Winners​
15
15
54%
54%
Ratio winners
31%
31%
-- Serve --
6
6
Aces
2
2
6
6
Avg Aces
2
2
1
1
Double Faults
0
0
1
1
Avg Double Faults
0
0
43/63
43/63
1st won total​
15/30
15/30
68%
68%
1st won %
50%
50%
10/17
10/17
2nd won total​
7/11
7/11
59%
59%
2nd won %
!
64%
64%
-- Break Points --
2/7
2/7
BP won
3/10
3/10
2/7
2/7
Avg BP won
3/10
3/10
!
29%
29%
Won
30%
30%
5
5
Conceded
6
6
5
5
Avg Conceded
6
6
1
1
Broken
3
3
1
1
Avg Broken
3
3
4
4
Saved
3
3

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Serdarusic Ilkel
Match played 1 1
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 22 13
Pts 79-68 49-48
Total Points 147 97
Winners 43 15
%Winners 54% 31%

Both Serdarusic and Ilkel played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Serdarusic and Ilkel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Serdarusic played 9 games more than Ilkel. Serdarusic scored 43 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Cem blasted 15 winners (31%).

Serve Performance

Serve Serdarusic Ilkel
Aces 6 2
Avg per match 6 2
1st in 63/80 30/41
%1st in 79% 73%
1st pts 43/63 15/30
%1st pts 68% 50%
2nd pts 10/17 7/11
%2nd pts 59% 64%

Serdarusic scored 6 aces . Ilkel scored 2 aces . Serdarusic won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 50% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Serdarusic Ilkel
Won 2 3
Converted 2/7 3/10
% Converted 29% 30%
Conceded 5 6
Saved 4 3
% Saved 80% 50%
Times Broken 1 3

Serdarusic broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Serdarusic surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Ilkel conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.

Serdarusic
Q1
Miedler
Total
Score 6-3 7-63
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 22 22
pts 79-68 79-68
Total points 147 147
Winners 43 43
%Winners 54% 54%
SERVE
Aces 6 6
Double Faults 1 1
1st in 63/80 63/80
% 1st in 79% 79%
1st pts 43/63 43/63
% 1st pts 68% 68%
2nd pts 10/17 10/17
% 2nd pts 59% 59%
Breaks
Won 2 2
Converted 2/7 2/7
Converted % 29% 29%
Conceded 5 5
Saved 4/5 4
Saved % 80% 80%
Times Broken 1 1
Ilkel
Q1
Klizan
Total
Score 7-64 ret.
Tot Set 1 1
Tot Games 13 13
pts 49-48 49-48
Total points 97 97
Winners 15 15
%Winners 31% 31%
SERVE
Aces 2 2
Double Faults 0 0
1st in 30/41 30/41
% 1st in 73% 73%
1st pts 15/30 15/30
% 1st pts 50% 50%
2nd pts 7/11 7/11
% 2nd pts 64% 64%
Breaks
Won 3 3
Converted 3/10 3/10
Converted % 30% 30%
Conceded 6 6
Saved 3/6 3
Saved % 50% 50%
Times Broken 3 3

Upcoming matches in the draw