Christian Langmo and Micah Braswell will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Micah Braswell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Micah Braswell is the pick to win this match.
Micah Braswell -> 1.4
Christian Langmo -> 2.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Micah Braswell
This will be the 2nd time that Christian Langmo and Micah Braswell face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Braswell (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Braswell won 7-5 6-0 in the qualifications in the Lexington Challenger back in July 2024.
Christian Langmo
28 - 24win/loss
471
333
LLWLLWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-29 | 23-21 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 485, the American got to the qualifications after beating Lorenzo Claverie 6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-1.
In the qualifications against Claverie, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-77 7-65 6-1). During the match, Langmo scored 110 points vs Claverie’s 99. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo fired 10 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Overall, Christian Langmo was extremely efficient on serve to win 92% (34/37) of his 1st serve and 57% (35/61) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Claverie 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Langmo has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (208-154). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Langmo has an overall2-3 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The American has a compiled 28-23 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Langmo has never competed in this tournament before.
Micah Braswell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-12 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 628 (career-high), Braswell got to the qualifications after beating Quinn Vandecasteele 6-2 3-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Vandecasteele (6-2 3-6 7-5). During the match Braswell scored 94 points vs Vandecasteele’s 84. Micah was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Braswell bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Micah Braswell lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Braswell put 64% of his first serves in, winning 77% (41/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Braswell broke Vandecasteele 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Braswell’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Wichita.
Braswell has a composed 16-6 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 29 |
| Pts | 110-99 | 94-84 |
| Total Points | 209 | 178 |
| Winners | 34 | 41 |
| %Winners | 31% | 44% |
Both Langmo and Braswell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Christian Langmo surrendered 1 set, while Micah Braswell dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Langmo and Braswell have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Langmo played 4 games more than Braswell. Langmo scored 34 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Micah blasted 41 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 2 |
| 1st in | 37/98 | 53/83 |
| %1st in | 38% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 34/37 | 41/53 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 35/61 | 15/30 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Langmo blasted 10 aces . Braswell recorded 2 aces . Langmo won 92% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Braswell won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 40% | 36% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Christian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Langmo dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Braswell broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Claverie |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-77 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 110-99 | 110-99 | |
| Total points | 209 | 209 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 37/98 | 37/98 | |
| % 1st in | 38% | 38% | |
| 1st pts | 34/37 | 34/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Braswell | |||
| Q1 Vandecasteele |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 94-84 | 94-84 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 53/83 | 53/83 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 41/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWWLLW
WWLLLWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Tyler ZinkZink (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joshua SheehySheehy – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
