Jan Choinski and Kilian Feldbausch will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jan Choinski who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jan Choinski is the pick to win this match.
Jan Choinski -> 1.65
Kilian Feldbausch -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jan Choinski vs. Kilian Feldbausch
There is no head to head record between Jan Choinski and Kilian Feldbausch since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jan Choinski
28 - 27win/loss
175
126
LWWLLLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 4-4 | 24-16 | 5-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, Choinski reached the qualifications after defeating Syl Gaxherri 7-6(2) 6-2.
In the qualifications, Choinski had a good straight sets win against Gaxherri (7-62 6-2). During the match, Choinski scored 75 points vs Gaxherri’s 49. Jan was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Choinski was unable to score even 1 ace during the encounter and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults. Jan Choinski lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Choinski put 73% of his first serves in, winning 74% (32/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. Choinski broke Gaxherri 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Choinski has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (340-231). 21-13 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Choinski has a compiled 191-111 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Tulln Challenger where he beat Lukas Neumayer in the final 6-4 6-1.
Jan has an overall 28-27 win-loss record in 2024, 21-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Kilian Feldbausch
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-17 | 4-2 | 20-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 419, the Swiss got to the qualifications after defeating Blaz Rola 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, Feldbausch had a good straight sets win against Rola (6-2 7-5). During the match Feldbausch scored 71 points vs Rola’s 58. Feldbausch was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Feldbausch couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Kilian Feldbausch lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Feldbausch put 91% of his first serves in, winning 62% (36/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (3/6) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Rola 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The Swiss has a compiled 8-2 win-loss record in 2024, 8-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
The Swiss has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Choinski | Feldbausch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 20 |
| Pts | 75-49 | 71-58 |
| Total Points | 124 | 129 |
| Winners | 32 | 36 |
| %Winners | 43% | 51% |
Both Choinski and Feldbausch played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Choinski and Feldbausch have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Choinski played 1 game more than Feldbausch. The German scored 32 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss blasted 36 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Choinski | Feldbausch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 43/59 | 58/64 |
| %1st in | 73% | 91% |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 36/58 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 3/6 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Choinski didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Feldbausch also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Choinski won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Feldbausch won 62% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Choinski | Feldbausch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 63% |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 57% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Choinski broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Jan conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Kilian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Feldbausch conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Choinski | |||
| Q1 Gaxherri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-49 | 75-49 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/59 | 43/59 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Feldbausch | |||
| Q1 Rola |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 71-58 | 71-58 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 58/64 | 58/64 | |
| % 1st in | 91% | 91% | |
| 1st pts | 36/58 | 36/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWWLL
LWWLWLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PichlerPichler – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Sandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Tim HandelHandel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
