Hynek Barton and Ilya Snitari will face off in the qualifications of the Sibiu Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 7. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hynek Barton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hynek Barton is the pick to win this match.
Hynek Barton -> 1.46
Ilya Snitari -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hynek Barton vs. Ilya Snitari
This will be the 2nd time that Hynek Barton and Ilya Snitari play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Snitari (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Snitari won 6-2 1-6 6-3 in the qualifications in the Iasi Challenger back in July 2024.
Hynek Barton
21 - 17win/loss
409
393
LLWLLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 486, Barton reached the qualifications after defeating Marc Popescu 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Popescu (6-1 6-1). During the match, Barton scored 57 points vs Popescu’s 27. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Barton fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Hynek Barton lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Barton put 73% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. Barton was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Popescu 6 times.
Barton has a solid record in the last 3 years having won 63% of his matches (79-47). 15-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Barton has an aggregate53-31 match record in the last 3 years on clay.
The Czech’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Vale do Lobo.
Hynek has a compiled 21-17 win-loss record in 2024, 15-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Hynek has never competed in this tournament before.
Ilya Snitari
30 - 13win/loss
558
479
LLWWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-17 | 3-2 | 31-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-28 | 12-11 | 21-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 60-24 | 7-3 | 53-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-17 | 5-2 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 561, the Moldovan got to the qualifications after defeating Federico Bondioli 2-6 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications against Bondioli, The Moldovan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Snitari scored 79 points vs Bondioli’s 69. Ilya was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Snitari bagged 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Ilya Snitari lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Snitari put 56% of his first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Ilya broke Bondioli 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Ilya’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Kursumlijska Banja,M15 Constanta and M15 Targu Jiu.
Ilya has a composed 30-13 win-loss record in 2024, 27-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barton | Snitari |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 25 |
| Pts | 57-27 | 79-69 |
| Total Points | 84 | 148 |
| Winners | 23 | 28 |
| %Winners | 40% | 35% |
Both Barton and Snitari played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ilya Snitari dropped 1 set while Hynek Barton hasn’t dropped a set so far. Barton has played 1 set(s) less than Snitari (2 vs 3). Therefore, Barton played 11 games less than Snitari. Barton scored 23 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Moldovan managed to score 28 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barton | Snitari |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 33/45 | 42/75 |
| %1st in | 73% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 28/42 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 19/33 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Barton managed to score 3 aces . Snitari struck 3 aces . Barton won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Snitari won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barton | Snitari |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/6 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 100% | 83% |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 83% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Czech broke his opponent 6 times with a 100% conversion rate. Hynek dropped his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Ilya broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Snitari conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barton | |||
| Q1 Popescu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 57-27 | 57-27 | |
| Total points | 84 | 84 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Snitari | |||
| Q1 Bondioli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 79-69 | 79-69 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 42/75 | 42/75 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 28/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWWWLW
LLWWLWWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Miguel DamasDamas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Timofey SkatovSkatov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Sebastian GimaGima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jorge PlansPlans – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim – Stefan PalosiPalosi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
