Federico Agustin Gomez and James McCabe will face off in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James McCabe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, James McCabe is the pick to win this match.
James McCabe -> 1.8
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. James McCabe
There is no head to head record between Federico Agustin Gomez and James McCabe since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Federico Agustin Gomez
49 - 20win/loss
137
135
LLLWWWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59-28 | 9-7 | 50-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177, Federico got to the 2nd round after beating Egor Gerasimov 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Gerasimov (6-4 7-5). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 61 points vs Gerasimov’s 55. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agustin Gomez managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Federico Agustin Gomez was exceptionally effective on serve to win 73% (32/44) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Federico was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Gerasimov 3 times.
Agustin Gomez has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (158-81). 5-4 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Agustin Gomez has an aggregate49-28 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Milan Challenger where he beat Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Trieste Challenger where he defeated Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 6-1 6-2.
The Argentine has a composed 49-20 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Federico has never competed in this tournament before.
James McCabe
43 - 24win/loss
256
255
LLWWLWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 55-35 | 47-28 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 322, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Rishab Agarwal 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Agarwal (6-2 6-4). During the match McCabe scored 61 points vs Agarwal’s 51. James was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, McCabe made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. James McCabe was quite efficient on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. McCabe broke Agarwal 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Roehampton.
James has a compiled 43-24 win-loss record in 2024, 36-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agustin Gomez | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 61-55 | 61-51 |
| Total Points | 116 | 112 |
| Winners | 32 | 26 |
| %Winners | 52% | 43% |
Both Agustin Gomez and McCabe played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Agustin Gomez and McCabe have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Agustin Gomez played 4 games more than McCabe. The Argentine scored 32 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, James fired 26 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agustin Gomez | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 4 |
| 1st in | 44/63 | 34/60 |
| %1st in | 70% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 32/44 | 26/34 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 58% |
Agustin Gomez blasted 9 aces . McCabe blasted 4 aces . Agustin Gomez won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, McCabe won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agustin Gomez | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 100% | 75% |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 86% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Federico lost his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. James broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Australian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Agustin Gomez | |||
| R1 Gerasimov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 61-55 | 61-55 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/63 | 44/63 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 32/44 | 32/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| McCabe | |||
| R1 Agarwal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 61-51 | 61-51 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/60 | 34/60 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWWLL
LLWWLWLWWW Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Paul JubbJubb (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (3-6 7-63 0-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Luca NardiNardi – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (6-2 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong (6-1 5-7 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
