Paul Jubb and Marc Polmans will face off in the 2^nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.33
Marc Polmans -> 3.14

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Marc Polmans

There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Marc Polmans since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.

Paul Jubb

Ranked no. 189 (career-high), Paul reached the 2^nd round after defeating Linang Xiao 6-3 6-4.

In the 1^st round, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Xiao (6-3 6-4). During the match, Jubb scored 68 points vs Xiao’s 56. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.

Talking about the service games, Jubb bagged 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 61% of his first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the 2nd serve. Jubb broke Xiao 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).

Jubb has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 69% of his matches (213-94). 26-12 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Jubb has a compiled119-47 record in the last 8 years on hard.

The Brit’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.

Jubb has an overall 44-23 win-loss record in 2024, 26-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger

Paul has never competed in this tournament before.

Marc Polmans

Ranked no. 202, Marc got to the 2^nd

round after defeating Vadym Ursu 7-5 6-1.

In the 1^st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Ursu (7-5 6-1). During the match Polmans scored 71 points vs Ursu’s 49. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.

About the serving games, Polmans managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Marc Polmans was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Polmans broke Ursu 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).

The Australian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Sarasota Challenger.

The Australian has a composed 15-22 win-loss record in 2024, 9-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2023. See his history.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Jubb	Polmans
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	19	19
Pts	68-56	71-49
Total Points	124	120
Winners	30	32
%Winners	44%	45%

Both Jubb and Polmans played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jubb and Polmans have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). Paul scored 30 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Marc scored 32 winners (45%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Jubb	Polmans
Aces	5	5
Avg per match	5	5
1st in	44/72	45/61
%1st in	61%	74%
1st pts	30/44	32/45
%1st pts	68%	71%
2nd pts	16/28	10/16
%2nd pts	57%	63%

Jubb blasted 5 aces . Polmans fired 5 aces . Jubb won 68% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Polmans won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Jubb	Polmans
Won	3	4
Converted	3/5	4/10
% Converted	60%	40%
Conceded	7	5
Saved	6	4
% Saved	86%	80%
Times Broken	1	1

Jubb broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Paul surrendered his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.

Jubb
	R1 Xiao	Total
Score	6-3 6-4
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	19	19
pts	68-56	68-56
Total points	124	124
Winners	30	30
%Winners	44%	44%
SERVE
Aces	5	5
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	44/72	44/72
% 1st in	61%	61%
1st pts	30/44	30/44
% 1st pts	68%	68%
2nd pts	16/28	16/28
% 2nd pts	57%	57%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/5	3/5
Converted %	60%	60%
Conceded	7	7
Saved	6/7	6
Saved %	86%	86%
Times Broken	1	1

Polmans
	R1 Ursu	Total
Score	7-5 6-1
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	19	19
pts	71-49	71-49
Total points	120	120
Winners	32	32
%Winners	45%	45%
SERVE
Aces	5	5
Double Faults	1	1
1st in	45/61	45/61
% 1st in	74%	74%
1st pts	32/45	32/45
% 1st pts	71%	71%
2nd pts	10/16	10/16
% 2nd pts	63%	63%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/10	4/10
Converted %	40%	40%
Conceded	5	5
Saved	4/5	4
Saved %	80%	80%
Times Broken	1	1

Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger

• Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (7-6⁵ 6-4) – See score progression
• Ye Cong MoCong Mo – Markos KalovelonisKalovelonis (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
• Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• James McCabeMcCabe – Rishab AgarwalAgarwal (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
• Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
• Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Maxime CressyCressy (7-6¹⁰ 6-3) – See score progression
• Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong – Kaichi UchidaUchida (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
• Radu AlbotAlbot – Yaojie ZengZeng (6-4 6-7² 7-5) – See score progression
• Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
• Paul JubbJubb – Linang XiaoXiao (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Luca NardiNardi – Jie CuiCui (6-4 3-6 7-6⁴) – See score progression
• Marc PolmansPolmans – Vadym UrsuUrsu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
• Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
• Terence AtmaneAtmane – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Christopher O’ConnellO’Connell – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Ye Cong MoCong Mo – Markos KalovelonisKalovelonis (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
• Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Radu AlbotAlbot – Yaojie ZengZeng (6-4 6-7(2) 7-5) – See score progression
• Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• James McCabeMcCabe – Rishab AgarwalAgarwal (6-2 6-4) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Kris Van WykVan Wyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (2-0) – H2H and prediction
• Paul JubbJubb – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction