Tyler Zink and Trey Hilderbrand will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tyler Zink who should win in 3 sets.
Tyler Zink -> 1.444
Trey Hilderbrand -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tyler Zink vs. Trey Hilderbrand
There is no head to head record between Tyler Zink and Trey Hilderbrand since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tyler Zink
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-11 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 633 (career-high), Tyler got to the qualifications after beating Martin Borisiouk 6-2 4-6 7-6(6).
In the qualifications, Zink defeated Borisiouk (6-2 4-6 7-66). During the match, Zink scored 99 points vs Borisiouk’s 92. Zink was pretty aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zink managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tyler Zink was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (43/54) of his 1st serve and 52% (22/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Zink broke Borisiouk 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Zink has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 54% of his matches (55-46). 8-4 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zink has a compiled32-29 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Tyler’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Rochester,M25 Southaven and M15 Huntsville.
Tyler has a compiled 22-6 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Tyler has never competed in this tournament before.
Trey Hilderbrand
20 - 14win/loss
744
730
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-19 | 15-10 | 9-8 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-13 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-9 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 828, the American reached the qualifications after beating Nathan Ponwith 6-3 4-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Ponwith (6-3 4-6 6-1). During the match Hilderbrand scored 89 points vs Ponwith’s 78. Hilderbrand was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Hilderbrand buried his opponent with 22 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 12 double faults. Trey Hilderbrand lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Hilderbrand put 53% of his first serves in, winning 84% (38/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (18/40) on the 2nd serve. Hilderbrand broke Ponwith 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Hilderbrand has a composed 19-14 win-loss record in 2024, 10-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zink | Hilderbrand |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 26 |
| Pts | 99-92 | 89-78 |
| Total Points | 191 | 167 |
| Winners | 43 | 38 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Both Zink and Hilderbrand played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Tyler Zink conceded 1 set, while Trey Hilderbrand conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Zink and Hilderbrand have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Zink played 5 games more than Hilderbrand. Tyler scored 43 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Trey fired 38 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zink | Hilderbrand |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 22 |
| 1st in | 54/96 | 45/85 |
| %1st in | 56% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 43/54 | 38/45 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 22/42 | 18/40 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 45% |
Zink struck 6 aces . Hilderbrand recorded 22 aces . Zink won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Hilderbrand won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zink | Hilderbrand |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 43% | 36% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Zink conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Hilderbrand broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Trey conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zink | |||
| Q1 Borisiouk | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 99-92 | 99-92 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 54/96 | 54/96 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 43/54 | 43/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/42 | 22/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hilderbrand | |||
| Q1 Ponwith | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 89-78 | 89-78 | |
| Total points | 167 | 167 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 22 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 12 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 45/85 | 45/85 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 38/45 | 38/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/40 | 18/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Karue SellSell (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Collin AltamiranoAltamirano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction