Patrick Maloney and Adam Neff will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on STADIUM COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Maloney who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Maloney is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Maloney -> 1.69
Adam Neff -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Maloney vs. Adam Neff
There is no head to head record between Patrick Maloney and Adam Neff since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Patrick Maloney
28 - 12win/loss
499
499
WWLWLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-20 | 18-9 | 7-2 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 629 (career-high), Patrick got to the qualifications after defeating Axel Nefve 6-2 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Nefve (6-2 7-63). During the match, Maloney scored 71 points vs Nefve’s 50. Maloney was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Maloney managed to score 10 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Patrick Maloney was very effective on serve to win 86% (31/36) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maloney broke Nefve twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Maloney has a solid win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 65% of his matches (56-30). 14-6 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Maloney has a compiled23-12 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Los Angeles.
Maloney has an overall 27-12 win-loss record in 2024, 14-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Adam Neff
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-16 | 7-9 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 684 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after beating Emmanuel Alex 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Adam had a good straight sets win against Alex (6-3 6-1). During the match Neff scored 62 points vs Alex’s 40. Neff was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about serving, Neff scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Adam Neff lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Neff put 45% of his first serves in, winning 70% (16/23) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the 2nd serve. Adam broke Alex 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Adam’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Dallas.
Neff has an aggregate 12-10 win-loss record in 2024, 6-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Maloney | Neff |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 16 |
| Pts | 71-50 | 62-40 |
| Total Points | 121 | 102 |
| Winners | 31 | 16 |
| %Winners | 44% | 26% |
Both Maloney and Neff played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Maloney and Neff have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Maloney played 5 games more than Neff. Maloney scored 31 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Adam scored 16 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Maloney | Neff |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 1 |
| 1st in | 36/56 | 23/51 |
| %1st in | 64% | 45% |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 16/23 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 15/28 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 54% |
Maloney scored 10 aces . Neff scored 1 ace . Maloney won 86% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Neff won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Maloney | Neff |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 40% | 75% |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Patrick broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Maloney quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Neff broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Neff conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Maloney | |||
| Q1 Nefve |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 71-50 | 71-50 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/56 | 36/56 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 31/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Neff | |||
| Q1 Alex |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-40 | 62-40 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/51 | 23/51 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 16/23 | 16/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLLWLWW
LLLLWLLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Karue SellSell (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Collin AltamiranoAltamirano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
