Quinn Vandecasteele and Rei Sakamoto will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quinn Vandecasteele who should win in 3 sets.
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 1.74
Rei Sakamoto -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Quinn Vandecasteele vs. Rei Sakamoto
There is no head to head record between Quinn Vandecasteele and Rei Sakamoto since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Quinn Vandecasteele
12 - 12win/loss
754
555
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 12-12 | 10-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 754, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Stefan Dostanic 6-3 3-6 7-6(2).
In the qualifications, Quinn defeated Dostanic (6-3 3-6 7-62). During the match, Vandecasteele scored 103 points vs Dostanic’s 98. Vandecasteele was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vandecasteele fired 10 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Quinn Vandecasteele lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Vandecasteele put 48% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (32/51) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Dostanic twice after converting 14% of his break points (2/14).
Vandecasteele has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 57% of his matches (57-43). 10-10 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Vandecasteele has a composed49-36 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Quinn has a composed 12-12 win-loss record in 2024, 10-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Quinn has never competed in this tournament before.
Rei Sakamoto
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-9 | 5-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 7-11 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 5-6 | 5-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 806 (career-high), the Japanese reached the qualifications after beating Felix Corwin 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2
.In the qualifications against Corwin, The Japanese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-2).During the match Sakamoto scored less points (1) than Corwin. In fact, the world no. 754 won 92 points vs Corwin’s. That means that Sakamoto was more focused during the important points. The Japanese was pretty aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Talking about serving, Sakamoto bagged 10 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Rei Sakamoto lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sakamoto put 72% of his first serves in, winning 81% (55/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. Rei broke Corwin twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
The Japanese’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Cervia and M25 La Nucia.
Sakamoto has a compiled 11-9 win-loss record in 2024, 5-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Vandecasteele | Sakamoto |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 31 | 30 |
Pts | 103-98 | 92-93 |
Total Points | 201 | 185 |
Winners | 33 | 55 |
%Winners | 32% | 60% |
Both Vandecasteele and Sakamoto played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Quinn Vandecasteele lost 1 set, while Rei Sakamoto lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Vandecasteele and Sakamoto have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Vandecasteele played 1 game more than Sakamoto. The American scored 33 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Sakamoto managed to score 55 winners (60%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Vandecasteele | Sakamoto |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 10 |
Avg per match | 10 | 10 |
1st in | 48/99 | 68/95 |
%1st in | 48% | 72% |
1st pts | 33/48 | 55/68 |
%1st pts | 69% | 81% |
2nd pts | 32/51 | 11/27 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 41% |
Vandecasteele bagged 10 aces . Sakamoto bagged 10 aces . Vandecasteele won 69% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Sakamoto won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Vandecasteele | Sakamoto |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 2 |
Converted | 2/14 | 2/5 |
% Converted | 14% | 40% |
Conceded | 9 | 5 |
Saved | 7 | 4 |
% Saved | 78% | 80% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Quinn broke his opponent twice with a 14% conversion rate. Vandecasteele lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Vandecasteele | |||
Q1 Dostanic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 3-6 7-62 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 103-98 | 103-98 | |
Total points | 201 | 201 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 48/99 | 48/99 | |
% 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
1st pts | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 32/51 | 32/51 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/14 | 2/14 | |
Converted % | 14% | 14% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Sakamoto | |||
Q1 Corwin | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 7-65 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 92-93 | 92-93 | |
Total points | 185 | 185 | |
Winners | 55 | 55 | |
%Winners | 60% | 60% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 68/95 | 68/95 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 55/68 | 55/68 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 11/27 | 11/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Karue SellSell (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Collin AltamiranoAltamirano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction