Hanyi Liu and Rishab Agarwal will play each other in the qualifications of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rishab Agarwal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rishab Agarwal is the pick to win this match.
Rishab Agarwal -> 1.86
Hanyi Liu -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hanyi Liu vs. Rishab Agarwal
There is no head to head record between Hanyi Liu and Rishab Agarwal since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Hanyi Liu
10 - 22win/loss
751
719
LLWLLLLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-28 | 8-22 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-24 | 19-23 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 12-17 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-7 | 3-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 751, Liu got to the qualifications after beating Yusuke Takahashi 2-6 7-6(4) 2-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Takahashi, the Chinese had a free pass after Takahashi retired on a 2-6 7-64 2-1 . scoreline.
Liu has a negative match record in the last 6 years having won 43% of his matches (82-108). 7-16 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Liu has an aggregate58-82 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Liu has an overall 10-22 win-loss record in 2024, 7-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Rishab Agarwal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-9 | 4-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 22-20 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-23 | 14-21 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 21-16 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 782, the Indian got to the qualifications after defeating Matthew Christopher Romios 6-3 2-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Christopher Romios, Agarwal had a free pass after Christopher Romios retired on a 6-3 2-0 . scoreline.
Rishab has a composed 4-4 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Liu | Agarwal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 11 |
| Pts | 65-75 | 50-37 |
| Total Points | 140 | 87 |
| Winners | 29 | 18 |
| %Winners | 45% | 36% |
Both Liu and Agarwal played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Hanyi Liu conceded 1 set while Rishab Agarwal hasn’t dropped a set so far. Liu has played 1 set more than Agarwal (4 vs 3). Therefore, Liu played 13 games more than Agarwal. Hanyi scored 29 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian managed to score 18 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Liu | Agarwal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 1 |
| 1st in | 41/70 | 26/41 |
| %1st in | 59% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 18/26 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 11/15 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 73% |
Liu managed to score 13 aces . Agarwal made 1 ace . Liu won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Agarwal won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 73% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Liu | Agarwal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 2 |
| Converted | 1/2 | 2/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 25% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Chinese broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. The Chinese surrendered his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Rishab was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Liu | |||
| Q1 Takahashi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-64 2-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 65-75 | 65-75 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 41/70 | 41/70 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Agarwal | |||
| Q1 Christopher |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 11 | 11 | |
| pts | 50-37 | 50-37 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/41 | 26/41 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWLL
WLLLLWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Pengyu LuLu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Tristan LamasineLamasine (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Markos KalovelonisKalovelonis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jie CuiCui – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Linang XiaoXiao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hanyi LiuLiu – Rishab AgarwalAgarwal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhenxiong DongDong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yaojie ZengZeng – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
