Andrew Paulson and Alessandro Giannessi will play each other in the qualifications of the Szczecin Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT BOHDAN TOMASZEWSKI. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrew Paulson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andrew Paulson is the pick to win this match.
Andrew Paulson -> 1.36
Alessandro Giannessi -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrew Paulson vs. Alessandro Giannessi
There is no head to head record between Andrew Paulson and Alessandro Giannessi since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Andrew Paulson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 1-3 | 31-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 6-3 | 30-15 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 19-8 | 11-11 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 345, Andrew reached the qualifications after defeating Marko Topo 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Topo (6-3 6-3). During the match, Paulson scored 62 points vs Topo’s 49. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paulson struck 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Andrew Paulson conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Paulson put 62% of his first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Paulson broke Topo 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Paulson has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (167-97). 12-6 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Paulson has an overall91-53 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Andrew’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Cordenons Challenger.
Paulson has an aggregate 12-6 win-loss record in 2024, 12-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Alessandro Giannessi
13 - 23win/loss
597
84
LLWLLLLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-25 | 0-5 | 13-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-33 | 3-5 | 33-27 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-30 | 2-1 | 18-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-27 | 0-2 | 31-20 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-14 | 0-1 | 10-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 544, Alessandro reached the qualifications after defeating Dorian Juszczak 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Giannessi had a good straight sets win against Juszczak (6-4 6-2). During the match Giannessi scored 66 points vs Juszczak’s 52. Giannessi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Giannessi fired 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Alessandro Giannessi lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Giannessi put 62% of his first serves in, winning 78% (31/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Giannessi broke Juszczak 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Giannessi has an aggregate 13-23 win-loss record in 2024, 13-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2016. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paulson | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 62-49 | 66-52 |
| Total Points | 111 | 118 |
| Winners | 29 | 31 |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% |
Both Paulson and Giannessi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Paulson and Giannessi have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). Andrew scored 29 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Giannessi scored 31 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paulson | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 34/55 | 40/65 |
| %1st in | 62% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 31/40 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/25 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 40% |
Paulson struck 6 aces . Giannessi recorded 5 aces . Paulson won 85% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Giannessi won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paulson | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Czech broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Paulson extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Alessandro conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paulson | |||
| Q1 Topo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-49 | 62-49 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 34/55 | 34/55 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 29/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Giannessi | |||
| Q1 Juszczak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 66-52 | 66-52 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/65 | 40/65 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/25 | 10/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWLW
LLWLLLLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Alexey VatutinVatutin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
