Nikoloz Basilashvili and Alexandre Reco will face off in the qualifications of the Rennes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT LE LIBERTE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nikoloz Basilashvili who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nikoloz Basilashvili is the pick to win this match.
Nikoloz Basilashvili -> 1.088
Alexandre Reco -> 6.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nikoloz Basilashvili vs. Alexandre Reco
There is no head to head record between Nikoloz Basilashvili and Alexandre Reco since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Nikoloz Basilashvili
39 - 24win/loss
208
16
LWLWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-32 | 11-8 | 27-15 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-19 | 1-8 | 0-5 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-31 | 3-11 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-27 | 18-11 | 8-8 | 3-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-14 | 4-6 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 361, Basilashvili got to the qualifications after defeating Maxence Beauge 7-6(4) 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Georgean had a good straight sets win against Beauge (7-64 6-1). During the match, Basilashvili scored 66 points vs Beauge’s 49. Basilashvili was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Basilashvili scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Nikoloz Basilashvili was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (34/45) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nikoloz broke Beauge twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Basilashvili has winning record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (267-258). 7-4 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Basilashvili has an overall 43-55 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Basilashvili’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Murcia Challenger.
Nikoloz has a composed 39-24 win-loss record in 2024, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rennes Challenger
Alexandre Reco
18 - 15win/loss
785
776
LWWLLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-22 | 14-12 | 1-2 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-18 | 19-12 | 1-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 4-13 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 876, the French player reached the qualifications after defeating Enzo Wallart 6-2 2-6 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, The French player defeated Wallart (6-2 2-6 7-63). During the match Reco scored 93 points vs Wallart’s 90. Alexandre was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Reco bagged 6 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Alexandre Reco lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Reco put 60% of his first serves in, winning 75% (42/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (18/37) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Wallart 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the final in Rideau.
Alexandre has a composed 18-15 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Basilashvili | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 29 |
| Pts | 66-49 | 93-90 |
| Total Points | 115 | 183 |
| Winners | 34 | 42 |
| %Winners | 52% | 45% |
Both Basilashvili and Reco played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alexandre Reco lost 1 set while Nikoloz Basilashvili hasn’t conceded a set so far. Basilashvili has played 1 set(s) less than Reco (2 vs 3). Therefore, Basilashvili played 9 games less than Reco. Basilashvili scored 34 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Alexandre struck 42 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Basilashvili | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
| 1st in | 45/60 | 56/93 |
| %1st in | 75% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 42/56 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 18/37 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 49% |
Basilashvili recorded 1 ace . Reco also bagged 6 aces . Basilashvili won 76% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Reco won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Basilashvili | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 60% |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Basilashvili broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Basilashvili pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Reco broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Alexandre conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Basilashvili | |||
| Q1 Beauge |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/60 | 45/60 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 34/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Reco | |||
| Q1 Wallart |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 2-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 93-90 | 93-90 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 56/93 | 56/93 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 42/56 | 42/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/37 | 18/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWWW
LWWLLLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Ben JonesJones (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Alexandre RecoReco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Michael GeertsGeerts (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Jules MarieMarie (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PoullainPoullain – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Kai WehneltWehnelt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
