Hamad Medjedovic and Martin Landaluce will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.4
Martin Landaluce -> 2.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hamad Medjedovic vs. Martin Landaluce
There is no head to head record between Hamad Medjedovic and Martin Landaluce since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Hamad Medjedovic
25 - 15win/loss
158
102
LWWLWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-20 | 9-6 | 15-8 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 137, Medjedovic got to the semifinal after defeating Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 6-2 6-4, Elias Ymer 6-4 1-1 ret. and Matej Dodig 6-0 6-4.
In the quarter, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Dodig (6-0 6-4). During the match, Medjedovic scored 57 points vs Dodig’s 35. Hamad was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Medjedovic made 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Medjedovic broke Dodig 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Medjedovic hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 60% of the points he played.
Medjedovic has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (135-78). 8-5 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Medjedovic has an overall32-22 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Serbian has an overall 25-15 win-loss record in 2024, 8-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
Martin Landaluce
27 - 17win/loss
162
158
LWWWWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-22 | 23-9 | 13-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 11-10 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254 (career-high), Martin reached the semifinal after beating Maxim Zhukov 6-3 4-6 6-4, Saba Purtseladze 6-4 6-3 and Elmer Moller 6-2 6-4.
In the quarter, Martin had a good straight sets win against Moller (6-2 6-4). During the match Landaluce scored 67 points vs Moller’s 52. The Spaniard was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Landaluce recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Martin Landaluce lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Landaluce put 59% of his first serves in, winning 82% (28/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. Landaluce broke Moller 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Landaluce has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Martin’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio.
The Spaniard has an overall 27-17 win-loss record in 2024, 14-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medjedovic | Landaluce |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 66 |
| Pts | 168-117 | 223-193 |
| Total Points | 285 | 416 |
| Winners | 69 | 89 |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% |
Both Medjedovic and Landaluce played 3 matches. At the moment, Martin Landaluce conceded 1 set while Hamad Medjedovic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Talking about their workload, Medjedovic and Landaluce have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Medjedovic played 20 games less than Landaluce. Hamad scored 69 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard scored 89 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medjedovic | Landaluce |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 5.7 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 84/137 | 127/213 |
| %1st in | 61% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 69/84 | 89/127 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 30/53 | 39/86 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 45% |
Medjedovic recorded 17 aces (5.7 per match). Landaluce recorded 11 aces (3.7 per match). Medjedovic won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Landaluce won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medjedovic | Landaluce |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 15 |
| Converted | 9/21 | 15/26 |
| % Converted | 43% | 58% |
| Conceded | 11 | 20 |
| Saved | 10 | 12 |
| % Saved | 91% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 8 |
Medjedovic broke his opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. Hamad conceded his serve once and he saved 91% of the break points that he conceded. The Spaniard broke his opponents 15 times with a 58% conversion rate. Landaluce conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medjedovic | |||||
| R1 Pacheco |
R2 Ymer |
1/4 Dodig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 1-1 ret. | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 12 | 16 | 46 | |
| pts | 69-49 | 42-33 | 57-35 | 168-117 | |
| Total points | 118 | 75 | 92 | 285 | |
| Winners | 25 | 21 | 23 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 50% | 40% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 8 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 23/37 | 27/43 | 84/137 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 62% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 21/23 | 23/27 | 69/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 91% | 85% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 6/14 | 10/16 | 30/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 43% | 63% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 1/2 | 4/10 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 50% | 40% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 | 0 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 4/4 | 0/0 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 100% | – | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Landaluce | |||||
| R1 Zhukov |
R2 Purtseladze |
1/4 Moller |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 19 | 18 | 66 | |
| pts | 86-84 | 70-57 | 67-52 | 223-193 | |
| Total points | 170 | 127 | 119 | 416 | |
| Winners | 29 | 32 | 28 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 46% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 5 | 3 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 46/76 | 47/79 | 34/58 | 127/213 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 59% | 59% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 32/47 | 28/34 | 89/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 68% | 82% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 14/32 | 10/24 | 39/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 44% | 42% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 7/15 | 4/4 | 4/7 | 15/26 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 100% | 57% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 10 | 3 | 20 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 8/10 | 2/3 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 80% | 67% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWWL
LWWWWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Istanbul Challenger
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Elmer MollerMoller (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-76 6-1 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Matej DodigDodig (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Ilia SimakinSimakin (6-73 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Matej DodigDodig (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Elmer MollerMoller (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-1) – H2H and prediction
