Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Sho Shimabukuro will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.5
Sho Shimabukuro -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Sho Shimabukuro
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Sho Shimabukuro since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
26 - 25win/loss
159
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-33 | 36-24 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149 (career-high), the got to the semifinal after defeating Egor Gerasimov 7-6(4) 6-1, Ryan Peniston 6-2 6-3 and Beibit Zhukayev 7-6(6) 6-3.
In the quarter, The had a good straight sets win against Zhukayev (7-66 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 74 points vs Zhukayev’s 60. Chak was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was quite efficient on serve to win 85% (40/47) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Chak broke Zhukayev once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Chak hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (117-89). 26-18 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed96-64 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has a composed 26-25 win-loss record in 2024, 26-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Sho Shimabukuro
19 - 21win/loss
171
135
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-25 | 20-15 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 19-17 | 7-1 | 9-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-25 | 38-20 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-20 | 28-18 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, the Japanese reached the semifinal after beating Yan Bai 7-5 ret., Terence Atmane 6-4 6-3 and Dalibor Svrcina 6-4 7-5.
In the quarter, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Svrcina (6-4 7-5). During the match Shimabukuro scored 76 points vs Svrcina’s 63. Shimabukuro was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Shimabukuro made 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sho Shimabukuro lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Shimabukuro put 62% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (11/30) on the 2nd serve. Sho broke Svrcina 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The Japanese’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Winnipeg Challenger.
The Japanese has an overall 19-21 win-loss record in 2024, 12-11 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 59 | 53 |
| Pts | 211-167 | 208-171 |
| Total Points | 378 | 379 |
| Winners | 99 | 86 |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Shimabukuro played 3 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Shimabukuro have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 6 games more than Shimabukuro. The scored 99 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese struck 86 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 27 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 123/182 | 124/206 |
| %1st in | 68% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 99/123 | 86/124 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 31/59 | 44/82 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 54% |
Lam Coleman Wong struck 27 aces (9 per match). Shimabukuro managed to score 11 aces (3.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 80% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Shimabukuro won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 13 |
| Converted | 9/27 | 13/19 |
| % Converted | 33% | 68% |
| Conceded | 10 | 18 |
| Saved | 8 | 12 |
| % Saved | 80% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The broke his opponents 9 times with a 33% conversion rate. Chak dropped his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Sho broke his opponents 13 times with a 68% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Gerasimov | R2 Peniston | 1/4 Zhukayev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | 6-2 6-3 | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 | 22 | 59 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 64-45 | 74-60 | 211-167 | |
| Total points | 135 | 109 | 134 | 378 | |
| Winners | 32 | 27 | 40 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 54% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 11 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 34/54 | 47/63 | 123/182 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 63% | 75% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 27/34 | 40/47 | 99/123 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 79% | 85% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/20 | 11/16 | 31/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 50% | 69% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/9 | 1/8 | 9/27 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 44% | 13% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 1 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 2/3 | 1/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 67% | 100% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Shimabukuro | |||||
| R1 Bai | R2 Atmane | 1/4 Svrcina | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 ret. | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 19 | 22 | 53 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 60-53 | 76-63 | 208-171 | |
| Total points | 127 | 113 | 139 | 379 | |
| Winners | 25 | 28 | 33 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 47% | 43% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 40/68 | 36/60 | 48/78 | 124/206 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 60% | 62% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/40 | 28/36 | 33/48 | 86/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 78% | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/28 | 14/24 | 11/30 | 44/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 58% | 37% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 6 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/4 | 6/8 | 13/19 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 75% | 75% | 68% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 9 | 18 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 4/4 | 5/9 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 100% | 56% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-72 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (7-64 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction