Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Beibit Zhukayev will face off in the quarter of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.58
Beibit Zhukayev -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Beibit Zhukayev
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Beibit Zhukayev since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
25 - 25win/loss
159
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-34 | 36-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong reached the quarter after beating Egor Gerasimov 7-6(4) 6-1 and Ryan Peniston 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Peniston (6-2 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 64 points vs Peniston’s 45. Lam Coleman Wong was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong bagged 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 63% of his first serves in, winning 79% (27/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The broke Peniston 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (116-89). 25-18 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed95-64 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has an aggregate 25-25 win-loss record in 2024, 25-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Beibit Zhukayev
23 - 21win/loss
238
171
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-28 | 14-16 | 6-4 | 3-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 218, Beibit reached the quarter after defeating Ajeet Rai 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) and Tomas Barrios Vera 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Beibit defeated Tomas Barrios Vera (7-64 6-72 7-5). During the match Zhukayev scored 115 points vs Tomas Barrios Vera’s 113. The Kazakhstani was exceptionally aggressive to blast 60 winners.
Talking about serving, Zhukayev scored 16 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Beibit Zhukayev was very effective on serve to win 83% (60/72) of his 1st serve and 54% (26/48) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zhukayev broke Tomas Barrios Vera once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Kazakhstani has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Zhukayev has a compiled 23-21 win-loss record in 2024, 11-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 68 |
| Pts | 137-107 | 211-203 |
| Total Points | 244 | 414 |
| Winners | 59 | 106 |
| %Winners | 43% | 50% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Zhukayev played 2 matches. At the moment, Beibit Zhukayev lost 2 sets while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t lost a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 2 set(s) less than Zhukayev (4 vs 6). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 31 games less than Zhukayev. The scored 59 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Kazakhstani fired 106 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 10.5 |
| 1st in | 76/119 | 125/208 |
| %1st in | 64% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 59/76 | 106/125 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 20/43 | 44/83 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 53% |
Lam Coleman Wong scored 16 aces (8 per match). Zhukayev blasted 21 aces (10.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Zhukayev won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 2 |
| Converted | 8/19 | 2/9 |
| % Converted | 42% | 22% |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 |
| Saved | 7 | 7 |
| % Saved | 78% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Chak broke his opponents 8 times with a 42% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong surrendered his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The Kazakhstani broke his opponents twice with a 22% conversion rate. Beibit conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Gerasimov | R2 Peniston | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 | 37 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 64-45 | 137-107 | |
| Total points | 135 | 109 | 244 | |
| Winners | 32 | 27 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 34/54 | 76/119 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 27/34 | 59/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 79% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/20 | 20/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 50% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/9 | 8/19 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 44% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 2/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 67% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Zhukayev | ||||
| R1 Rai | R2 Tomas Barrios Vera | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 7-63 | 7-64 6-72 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 38 | 68 | |
| pts | 96-90 | 115-113 | 211-203 | |
| Total points | 186 | 228 | 414 | |
| Winners | 46 | 60 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 52% | 50% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 16 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 53/88 | 72/120 | 125/208 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 46/53 | 60/72 | 106/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 83% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 26/48 | 44/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 54% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Converted | 1/7 | 1/2 | 2/9 | |
| Converted % | 14% | 50% | 22% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 5/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Norbert GombosGombos – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction