Jerome Kym and Lukas Neumayer will play each other in the quarter of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jerome Kym is the pick to win this match.
Jerome Kym -> 1.44
Lukas Neumayer -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Lukas Neumayer
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Lukas Neumayer since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
50 - 15win/loss
134
134
LWLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59-20 | 14-4 | 37-11 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180 (career-high), Kym got to the quarter after defeating Max Houkes 4-6 6-3 6-4 and Martin Krumich 6-4 4-6 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Kym defeated Krumich (6-4 4-6 6-1). During the match, Kym scored 86 points vs Krumich’s 70. The Swiss was quite aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kym recorded 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jerome Kym lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kym put 70% of his first serves in, winning 80% (45/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Krumich 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Swiss has dropped 2 set in this tournament to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Kym has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 69% of his matches (122-56). 37-10 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kym has an overall71-33 record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Prostejov Challenger where he defeated Chun Hsin Tseng in the final 6-2 3-6 6-2 and the Zug Challenger where he beat Roman Andres Burruchaga in the final 6-4 6-4.
The Swiss has a compiled 50-15 win-loss record in 2024, 37-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Kym has never competed in this tournament before.
Lukas Neumayer
25 - 25win/loss
226
206
LWWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-32 | 2-2 | 38-29 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-32 | 2-1 | 38-28 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-26 | 12-4 | 41-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-25 | 8-10 | 16-14 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320, Lukas reached the quarter after beating Sandro Kopp 6-4 6-2 and Oliver Crawford 6-4 6-0.
In the 2nd round, Neumayer had a good straight sets win against Crawford (6-4 6-0). During the match Neumayer scored 60 points vs Crawford’s 41. The Austrian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Neumayer blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Lukas Neumayer was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Neumayer broke Crawford 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Neumayer hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Neumayer’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Telfs.
Neumayer has an aggregate 25-25 win-loss record in 2024, 23-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021, 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kym | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 56 | 34 |
| Pts | 175-154 | 124-86 |
| Total Points | 329 | 210 |
| Winners | 95 | 45 |
| %Winners | 54% | 36% |
Both Kym and Neumayer played 2 matches. At the moment, Jerome Kym lost 2 sets while Lukas Neumayer hasn’t dropped a set so far. Kym has played 2 sets more than Neumayer (6 vs 4). Therefore, Kym played 22 games more than Neumayer. Kym scored 95 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Neumayer blasted 45 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kym | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 124/174 | 60/100 |
| %1st in | 71% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 95/124 | 45/60 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 25/50 | 30/40 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 75% |
Kym struck 11 aces (5.5 per match). Neumayer bagged 6 aces (3 per match). Kym won 77% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Neumayer won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kym | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 7/14 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 2 |
| Saved | 7 | 2 |
| % Saved | 70% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Jerome broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kym conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Lukas broke his opponents 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Neumayer was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Kym | ||||
| R1 Houkes |
R2 Krumich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 27 | 56 | |
| pts | 89-84 | 86-70 | 175-154 | |
| Total points | 173 | 156 | 329 | |
| Winners | 50 | 45 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 52% | 54% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 68/94 | 56/80 | 124/174 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 70% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 50/68 | 45/56 | 95/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 80% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 11/24 | 25/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 46% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 4/7 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 57% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 3/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 60% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Neumayer | ||||
| R1 Kopp |
R2 Crawford |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 16 | 34 | |
| pts | 64-45 | 60-41 | 124-86 | |
| Total points | 109 | 101 | 210 | |
| Winners | 21 | 24 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 40% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 33/52 | 60/100 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 63% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 24/33 | 45/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 73% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 13/19 | 30/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 68% | 75% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/6 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWWLW
LWWWWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger
- Karol Drzewiecki/Piotr MatuszewskiDrzewiecki/Piotr Matuszewski – Sandro Kopp/Matthias UjvaryKopp/Matthias Ujvary (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Masur/Kai WehneltMasur/Kai Wehnelt – Andrew Paulson/Michael VrbenskyPaulson/Michael Vrbensky (2-6 6-2 11-9) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-1) – H2H and prediction
