Jerome Kym and Martin Krumich will face off in the 2^nd round of the Tulln Challenger for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jerome Kym is the pick to win this match.
Jerome Kym -> 1.34
Martin Krumich -> 3.08

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Martin Krumich

This will be the 2^nd time that Jerome Kym and Martin Krumich clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kym (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.

The last time that they fought against each other, Kym won 6-2 7-6(3) in the qualifications in the Prostejov Challenger back in June 2024.

Jerome Kym

Ranked no. 180 (career-high), the Swiss got to the 2^nd round after defeating Max Houkes 4-6 6-3 6-4.

In the 1^st round against Houkes, Kym recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Kym scored 89 points vs Houkes’s 84. Jerome was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.

Regarding the service games, Kym managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Jerome Kym was very effective on serve to win 74% (50/68) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kym broke Houkes twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).

Kym has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (121-56). 36-10 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kym has an aggregate70-33 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.

His best result of the season was winning the title the Prostejov Challenger where he defeated Chun Hsin Tseng in the final 6-2 3-6 6-2 and the Zug Challenger where he defeated Roman Andres Burruchaga in the final 6-4 6-4.

The Swiss has an aggregate 49-15 win-loss record in 2024, 36-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Tulln Challenger

Jerome has never competed in this tournament before.

Martin Krumich

Ranked no. 314 (career-high), the Czech reached the 2^nd round after beating Jonas Forejtek 7-6(4) 6-2.

In the 1^st round, Martin had a good straight sets win against Forejtek (7-6⁴ 6-2). During the match Krumich scored 73 points vs Forejtek’s 58. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.

Talking about serving, Krumich managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Martin Krumich lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Krumich put 70% of his first serves in, winning 78% (35/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (8/19) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Forejtek 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).

Martin’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Satu Mare.

Martin has an overall 22-24 win-loss record in 2024, 22-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Kym	Krumich
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	2
Tot Games	29	21
Pts	89-84	73-58
Total Points	173	131
Winners	50	35
%Winners	56%	48%

Both Kym and Krumich played 1 match. At the moment, Jerome Kym conceded 1 set while Martin Krumich hasn’t lost a set so far. Kym has played 1 set more than Krumich (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kym played 8 games more than Krumich. The Swiss scored 50 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, Martin fired 35 winners (48%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Kym	Krumich
Aces	5	3
Avg per match	5	3
1st in	68/94	45/64
%1st in	72%	70%
1st pts	50/68	35/45
%1st pts	74%	78%
2nd pts	14/26	8/19
%2nd pts	54%	42%

Kym fired 5 aces . Krumich managed to score 3 aces . Kym won 74% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Krumich won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Kym	Krumich
Won	2	4
Converted	2/5	4/5
% Converted	40%	80%
Conceded	5	4
Saved	4	2
% Saved	80%	50%
Times Broken	1	2

Jerome broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Jerome surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.

Kym
	R1 Houkes	Total
Score	4-6 6-3 6-4
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	29	29
pts	89-84	89-84
Total points	173	173
Winners	50	50
%Winners	56%	56%
SERVE
Aces	5	5
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	68/94	68/94
% 1st in	72%	72%
1st pts	50/68	50/68
% 1st pts	74%	74%
2nd pts	14/26	14/26
% 2nd pts	54%	54%
Breaks
Won	2	2
Converted	2/5	2/5
Converted %	40%	40%
Conceded	5	5
Saved	4/5	4
Saved %	80%	80%
Times Broken	1	1

Krumich
	R1 Forejtek	Total
Score	7-64 6-2
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	21	21
pts	73-58	73-58
Total points	131	131
Winners	35	35
%Winners	48%	48%
SERVE
Aces	3	3
Double Faults	1	1
1st in	45/64	45/64
% 1st in	70%	70%
1st pts	35/45	35/45
% 1st pts	78%	78%
2nd pts	8/19	8/19
% 2nd pts	42%	42%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/5	4/5
Converted %	80%	80%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	2/4	2
Saved %	50%	50%
Times Broken	2	2

Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger

• Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Marko TopoTopo – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-4 7-6⁵) – See score progression
• Jakub NicodNicod – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
• Valentin RoyerRoyer – Blaz RolaRola (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-4 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
• Jerome KymKym – Max HoukesHoukes (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Petr NesterovNesterov (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Marvin MoellerMoeller – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Sandro KoppKopp (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Daniel MasurMasur – Dennis NovakNovak (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
• Martin KrumichKrumich – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (7-6⁴ 6-2) – See score progression
• Luka MikrutMikrut – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (4-6 7-6⁴ 6-1) – See score progression
• Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-6¹⁰ 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Marvin MoellerMoeller – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Petr NesterovNesterov (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Marko TopoTopo – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
• Daniel MasurMasur – Dennis NovakNovak (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
• Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-4 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
• Valentin RoyerRoyer – Blaz RolaRola (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Sandro KoppKopp (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Jerome KymKym – Max HoukesHoukes (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Marvin MoellerMoeller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
• Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Oliver CrawfordCrawford – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Martin KrumichKrumich – (0-1) – H2H and prediction