![Prediction And Head To Head Terence Atmane Vs. Sho Shimabukuro Hctiwtjsoa Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Sho Shimabukuro](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Terence-Atmane-vs.-Sho-Shimabukuro-hctiWTJsOA.jpg)
Terence Atmane and Sho Shimabukuro will face off in the 2nd round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.5
Sho Shimabukuro -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Sho Shimabukuro
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Sho Shimabukuro since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Terence Atmane](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/3128Terence-Atmane.jpg)
29 - 25win/loss
120
118
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-25 | 21-14 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 120, Atmane reached the 2nd round after defeating Mark Lajal 7-6(4) 1-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The French player defeated Lajal (7-64 1-6 6-1).During the match, Atmane scored less points (2) than Lajal. In fact, the world no. 120 won 83 points vs Lajal’s. That means that Atmane was more focused during the important points. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Atmane scored 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Terence Atmane lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Atmane put 68% of his first serves in, winning 71% (44/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (11/29) on the 2nd serve. Terence was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Lajal 3 times.
Atmane has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (194-116). 21-14 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Atmane has an overall150-77 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Atmane’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Granby Challenger.
The French player has an aggregate 29-25 win-loss record in 2024, 21-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Sho Shimabukuro
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Sho Shimabukuro](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Sho-Shimabukuro.jpg)
17 - 21win/loss
239
135
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-21 | 10-11 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-26 | 19-17 | 7-1 | 9-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 42-25 | 38-20 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-20 | 28-18 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, the Japanese got to the 2nd round after defeating Yan Bai 7-5 ret..
In the 1st round against Bai, Sho had a free pass after Bai retired on a 7-5 . scoreline.
Sho’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Winnipeg Challenger.
Sho has an overall 17-21 win-loss record in 2024, 10-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Shimabukuro has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Atmane | Shimabukuro |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 27 | 12 |
Pts | 83-85 | 72-55 |
Total Points | 168 | 127 |
Winners | 44 | 25 |
%Winners | 53% | 35% |
Both Atmane and Shimabukuro played 1 match. At the moment, Terence Atmane lost 1 set while Sho Shimabukuro hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Atmane has played 1 set more than Shimabukuro (3 vs 2). Therefore, Atmane played 15 games more than Shimabukuro. Terence scored 44 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Shimabukuro managed to score 25 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Atmane | Shimabukuro |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 5 |
Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
1st in | 62/91 | 40/68 |
%1st in | 68% | 59% |
1st pts | 44/62 | 25/40 |
%1st pts | 71% | 63% |
2nd pts | 11/29 | 19/28 |
%2nd pts | 38% | 68% |
Atmane made 8 aces . Shimabukuro bagged 5 aces . Atmane won 71% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Shimabukuro won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Atmane | Shimabukuro |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/3 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 100% | 57% |
Conceded | 7 | 5 |
Saved | 4 | 3 |
% Saved | 57% | 60% |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The French player lost his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Sho broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Sho conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
Atmane | |||
R1 Lajal |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 1-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 83-85 | 83-85 | |
Total points | 168 | 168 | |
Winners | 44 | 44 | |
%Winners | 53% | 53% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 62/91 | 62/91 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 44/62 | 44/62 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 11/29 | 11/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Shimabukuro | |||
R1 Bai |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
Total points | 127 | 127 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 40/68 | 40/68 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 25/40 | 25/40 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yi ZhouZhou (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Ajeet RaiRai (2-6 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Blake MottMott (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Cristian GarinGarin (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Mark LajalLajal (7-64 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Nerman FaticFatic (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yibing WuWu (6-75 3-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Rigele TeTe (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Cristian GarinGarin (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (7-5 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yibing WuWu (6-7(5) 3-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Nerman FaticFatic (6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Blake MottMott (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-7(2) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Norbert GombosGombos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction