Martin Landaluce and Saba Purtseladze will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on LIMAK COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Landaluce who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Landaluce is the pick to win this match.
Martin Landaluce -> 1.24
Saba Purtseladze -> 3.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Martin Landaluce vs. Saba Purtseladze
There is no head to head record between Martin Landaluce and Saba Purtseladze since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Martin Landaluce
25 - 17win/loss
151
151
LWWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-24 | 23-9 | 13-11 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 11-10 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254 (career-high), the Spaniard reached the 2nd round after beating Maxim Zhukov 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Martin defeated Zhukov (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match, Landaluce scored 86 points vs Zhukov’s 84. The Spaniard was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Landaluce recorded 4 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Martin Landaluce lost the serve 5 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Landaluce put 61% of his first serves in, winning 63% (29/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Martin broke Zhukov 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Landaluce has a winning win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 53% of his matches (51-46). 12-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Landaluce has a compiled23-17 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
The Spaniard’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio.
Landaluce has an overall 25-17 win-loss record in 2024, 12-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
Martin has never competed in this tournament before.
Saba Purtseladze
32 - 25win/loss
441
395
LLLLWWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-34 | 25-20 | 9-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-37 | 44-27 | 1-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-35 | 34-26 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-23 | 20-16 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 455, will start his run in the Istanbul Challenger after he played his last match in the Istanbul Challenger where he beat 6-3 6-1 to Damm in the 1st round on the 3rd of September.
The Georgean has an aggregate 31-25 win-loss record in 2024, 21-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
The Georgean’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Doha.
In terms of his career, Saba has an overall 151-139 record. He has a positive 122-84 record on hard.
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Landaluce | Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 55 |
| Pts | 86-84 | 189-135 |
| Total Points | 170 | 324 |
| Winners | 29 | 72 |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% |
Landaluce played 1 match while Purtseladze competed in 3 matches. Purtseladze started his run from the qualifications while Landaluce had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Martin Landaluce surrendered 1 set while Saba Purtseladze hasn’t lost a set so far. Landaluce has played 3 set(s) less than Purtseladze (3 vs 6). Therefore, Landaluce played 26 games less than Purtseladze. The Spaniard scored 29 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Saba bagged 72 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Landaluce | Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
| 1st in | 46/76 | 94/145 |
| %1st in | 61% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 72/94 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 31/51 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 61% |
Landaluce struck 4 aces . Purtseladze scored 15 aces (5 per match). Landaluce won 63% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Purtseladze won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Landaluce | Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 12 |
| Converted | 7/15 | 12/23 |
| % Converted | 47% | 52% |
| Conceded | 7 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 7 |
| % Saved | 29% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Martin broke his opponent 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Landaluce surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 29% of the break points that he conceded. Purtseladze broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Saba conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Landaluce | |||
| R1 Zhukov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 86-84 | 86-84 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 46/76 | 46/76 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Purtseladze | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWW
LLLLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Istanbul Challenger
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Martin DammDamm (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-72 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – August HolmgrenHolmgren (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Egor AgafonovAgafonov – Yanki ErelErel (3-6 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Koray KirciKirci (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Tuncay DuranDuran (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Cezar CretuCretu (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-7(2) 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – August HolmgrenHolmgren (7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Egor AgafonovAgafonov – Yanki ErelErel (3-6 6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Martin DammDamm (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
