![Prediction And Head To Head Duje Ajdukovic Vs. Matej Dodig Qfmpupiydk Prediction and head to head Duje Ajdukovic vs. Matej Dodig](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Duje-Ajdukovic-vs.-Matej-Dodig-QfmPuPIYDk.jpg)
Duje Ajdukovic and Matej Dodig will play each other in the 2nd round of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on LIMAK COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Duje Ajdukovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Duje Ajdukovic is the pick to win this match.
Duje Ajdukovic -> 1.46
Matej Dodig -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Duje Ajdukovic vs. Matej Dodig
There is no head to head record between Duje Ajdukovic and Matej Dodig since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Duje Ajdukovic
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Duje Ajdukovic](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Duje-Ajdukovic.jpg)
31 - 24win/loss
134
106
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-24 | 13-9 | 13-10 | 5-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 59-25 | 2-1 | 50-21 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-31 | 0-1 | 22-23 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 33-31 | 1-1 | 29-23 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 30-11 | 4-3 | 22-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 134, Ajdukovic got to the 2nd round after beating Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Ajdukovic had a good straight sets win against Ramanathan (6-4 6-3). During the match, Ajdukovic scored 60 points vs Ramanathan’s 50. Ajdukovic was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ajdukovic bagged 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Duje Ajdukovic conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Ajdukovic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 88% (28/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Duje broke Ramanathan 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Ajdukovic has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (255-161). 13-9 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ajdukovic has an overall48-31 record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Manacor Challenger where he defeated Matteo Gigante in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
The Croatian has an overall 31-24 win-loss record in 2024, 13-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
Matej Dodig
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Matej Dodig](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/players_nophoto.gif)
38 - 18win/loss
303
286
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-18 | 13-2 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-16 | 1-2 | 38-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 303, the Croatian reached the 2nd round after defeating Tuncay Duran 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Matej had a good straight sets win against Duran (6-3 6-4). During the match Dodig scored 68 points vs Duran’s 56. Dodig was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Dodig made 4 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Matej Dodig conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Dodig put 71% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Duran twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Dodig’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Rovinj.
Dodig has a composed 38-18 win-loss record in 2024, 13-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ajdukovic | Dodig |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 |
Pts | 60-50 | 68-56 |
Total Points | 110 | 124 |
Winners | 28 | 31 |
%Winners | 47% | 46% |
Both Ajdukovic and Dodig played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ajdukovic and Dodig have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). Duje scored 28 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Matej managed to score 31 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ajdukovic | Dodig |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 4 |
Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
1st in | 32/53 | 44/62 |
%1st in | 60% | 71% |
1st pts | 28/32 | 31/44 |
%1st pts | 88% | 70% |
2nd pts | 9/21 | 12/18 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 67% |
Ajdukovic managed to score 6 aces . Dodig fired 4 aces . Ajdukovic won 88% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Dodig won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ajdukovic | Dodig |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 2 |
Converted | 3/6 | 2/5 |
% Converted | 50% | 40% |
Conceded | 1 | 2 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Ajdukovic broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Duje very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Dodig broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Croatian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Ajdukovic | |||
R1 Ramanathan |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 60-50 | 60-50 | |
Total points | 110 | 110 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 32/53 | 32/53 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 28/32 | 28/32 | |
% 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Dodig | |||
R1 Duran |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 68-56 | 68-56 | |
Total points | 124 | 124 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 44/62 | 44/62 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Istanbul Challenger
- Benjamin LockLock – August HolmgrenHolmgren (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Egor AgafonovAgafonov – Yanki ErelErel (3-6 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Martin DammDamm (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-72 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Cezar CretuCretu (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Koray KirciKirci (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Tuncay DuranDuran (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-7(2) 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – August HolmgrenHolmgren (7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Egor AgafonovAgafonov – Yanki ErelErel (3-6 6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Martin DammDamm (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – (0-0) – H2H and prediction