Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ryan Peniston will face off in the 2nd round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.4
Ryan Peniston -> 2.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Ryan Peniston
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ryan Peniston since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
24 - 25win/loss
170
128
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after beating Egor Gerasimov 7-6(4) 6-1.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Gerasimov (7-64 6-1). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 73 points vs Gerasimov’s 62. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 65% of his first serves in, winning 76% (32/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Gerasimov 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (115-89). 24-18 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed94-64 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
The has a compiled 24-25 win-loss record in 2024, 24-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Peniston
8 - 16win/loss
449
123
LWWWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-24 | 27-16 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 20-12 | 1-8 | 7-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-26 | 4-8 | 5-4 | 13-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-23 | 25-9 | 12-4 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-12 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 406, Ryan reached the 2nd round after beating Yi Zhou 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Ryan had a good straight sets win against Zhou (6-4 6-2). During the match Peniston scored 69 points vs Zhou’s 49. Peniston was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Peniston scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ryan Peniston was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Peniston broke Zhou 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Peniston has an aggregate 8-16 win-loss record in 2024, 7-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 |
| Pts | 73-62 | 69-49 |
| Total Points | 135 | 118 |
| Winners | 32 | 27 |
| %Winners | 44% | 39% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Peniston played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Peniston have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 2 games more than Peniston. The scored 32 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Ryan bagged 27 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 33/53 |
| %1st in | 65% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 27/33 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 12/20 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 60% |
Lam Coleman Wong recorded 8 aces . Peniston managed to score 4 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Peniston won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 40% | 60% |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 83% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong lost his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Peniston broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Ryan was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Gerasimov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 73-62 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 42/65 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 32/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Peniston | |||
| R1 Zhou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-49 | 69-49 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/53 | 33/53 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 27/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LWWWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Mark LajalLajal (7-64 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Blake MottMott (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yi ZhouZhou (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Ajeet RaiRai (2-6 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Nerman FaticFatic (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yibing WuWu (6-75 3-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Cristian GarinGarin (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Rigele TeTe (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Cristian GarinGarin (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (7-5 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yibing WuWu (6-7(5) 3-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Nerman FaticFatic (6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Blake MottMott (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-7(2) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Norbert GombosGombos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
