Federico Agustin Gomez and Rio Noguchi will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Agustin Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Agustin Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.65
Rio Noguchi -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Rio Noguchi
There is no head to head record between Federico Agustin Gomez and Rio Noguchi since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Federico Agustin Gomez
47 - 19win/loss
137
135
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 59-28 | 9-7 | 50-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 182, the Argentine got to the 1st round after defeating Mikalai Haliak 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Agustin Gomez has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (156-80). 3-3 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Agustin Gomez has an aggregate47-27 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Milan Challenger where he defeated Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Trieste Challenger where he beat Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 6-1 6-2.
Agustin Gomez has a composed 47-19 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Rio Noguchi
34 - 23win/loss
301
201
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-31 | 36-22 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 19-31 | 12-18 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 54-22 | 41-10 | 9-9 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-26 | 18-18 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-12 | 5-6 | 0-3 | 3-2 | 6-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, Noguchi got to the 1st round after beating Mirza Basic 6-7(6) 7-5 6-0 and Jie Cui 7-6(7) 6-2.
In the qualifications, Rio had a good straight sets win against Cui (7-67 6-2). During the match Noguchi scored 80 points vs Cui’s 59. The Japanese was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Noguchi blasted 4 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Rio Noguchi lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Noguchi put 86% of his first serves in, winning 75% (43/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (4/9) on the 2nd serve. Rio broke Cui 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The Japanese’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Swan Hill and the Jinan Challenger.
Noguchi has a composed 34-23 win-loss record in 2024, 29-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Agustin Gomez | Noguchi |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
Tot Games | 29 | 52 |
Pts | 90-78 | 187-142 |
Total Points | 168 | 329 |
Winners | 43 | 90 |
%Winners | 48% | 48% |
Agustin Gomez played 1 match while Noguchi competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Agustin Gomez lost 1 set, while Rio Noguchi dropped 1 set. Agustin Gomez has played 2 set(s) less than Noguchi (3 vs 5). Therefore, Agustin Gomez played 23 games less than Noguchi. Federico scored 43 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese scored 90 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Agustin Gomez | Noguchi |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 9 |
Avg per match | 9 | 4.5 |
1st in | 61/87 | 122/160 |
%1st in | 70% | 76% |
1st pts | 43/61 | 90/122 |
%1st pts | 70% | 74% |
2nd pts | 14/26 | 19/38 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 50% |
Agustin Gomez blasted 9 aces . Noguchi blasted 9 aces (4.5 per match). Agustin Gomez won 70% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Noguchi won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Noguchi |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 9 |
Converted | 4/7 | 9/18 |
% Converted | 57% | 50% |
Conceded | 8 | 9 |
Saved | 5 | 6 |
% Saved | 63% | 67% |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Agustin Gomez broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Argentine surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Agustin Gomez | ||||
Q1 Haliak |
Q3 Gombos |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 18 | 47 | |
pts | 90-78 | – | 90-78 | |
Total points | 168 | 0 | 168 | |
Winners | 43 | 43 | ||
%Winners | 48% | 0% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 9 | 0 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | ||
1st in | 61/87 | / | 61/87 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 0% | 70% | |
1st pts | 43/61 | / | 43/61 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 0% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 14/26 | / | 14/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 0% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | ||
Converted | 4/7 | / | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 0% | 57% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | ||
Saved | 5/8 | 0/ | 5 | |
Saved % | 63% | – | 32% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Noguchi | ||||
Q1 Basic |
Q3 Cui |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-76 7-5 6-0 | 7-67 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 21 | 52 | |
pts | 107-83 | 80-59 | 187-142 | |
Total points | 190 | 139 | 329 | |
Winners | 47 | 43 | 90 | |
%Winners | 44% | 54% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 65/94 | 57/66 | 122/160 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 86% | 76% | |
1st pts | 47/65 | 43/57 | 90/122 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 75% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 15/29 | 4/9 | 19/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 44% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
Converted | 6/10 | 3/8 | 9/18 | |
Converted % | 60% | 38% | 50% | |
Conceded | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 1/2 | 6 | |
Saved % | 71% | 50% | 61% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Rigele TeTe (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-64 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (7-5 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Norbert GombosGombos – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Fajing SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Ajeet RaiRai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction