Corentin Denolly and Kilian Feldbausch will square off in the qualifications of the Genova Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on CAMPO 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kilian Feldbausch who should win in 2 sets.
Kilian Feldbausch -> 1.39
Corentin Denolly -> 2.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Corentin Denolly vs. Kilian Feldbausch
There is no head to head record between Corentin Denolly and Kilian Feldbausch since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Corentin Denolly
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-18 | 0-0 | 38-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-18 | 0-0 | 32-15 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-20 | 0-0 | 39-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-24 | 2-4 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-12 | 8-8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Simone Agostini 4-6 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications against Agostini, Corentin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-1). During the match, Denolly scored 94 points vs Agostini’s 75. Corentin was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Denolly made 2 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Corentin Denolly lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Denolly put 56% of his first serves in, winning 67% (34/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (19/40) on the 2nd serve. Corentin broke Agostini 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Denolly has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (370-217). 38-18 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Denolly has a compiled 268-137 match record in the last years on clay.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Hammamet and M15 Orange Park.
Corentin has a compiled 38-18 win-loss record in 2024, 38-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Genova Challenger
Corentin has never competed in this tournament before.
Kilian Feldbausch
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-17 | 4-2 | 20-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 445, the Swiss reached the qualifications after defeating Mircea-Alexandru Jecan 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Jecan (6-1 6-1). During the match Feldbausch scored 51 points vs Jecan’s 23. The Swiss was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Feldbausch fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Kilian Feldbausch lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Feldbausch put 62% of his first serves in, winning 83% (20/24) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (7/15) on the 2nd serve. Kilian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Jecan 6 times.
The Swiss has a compiled 5-1 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Denolly | Feldbausch |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 24 | 14 |
Pts | 94-75 | 51-23 |
Total Points | 169 | 74 |
Winners | 34 | 20 |
%Winners | 36% | 39% |
Both Denolly and Feldbausch played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Corentin Denolly dropped 1 set while Kilian Feldbausch hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Denolly has played 1 set more than Feldbausch (3 vs 2). Therefore, Denolly played 10 games more than Feldbausch. Denolly scored 34 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Kilian recorded 20 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Denolly | Feldbausch |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 2 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
1st in | 51/91 | 24/39 |
%1st in | 56% | 62% |
1st pts | 34/51 | 20/24 |
%1st pts | 67% | 83% |
2nd pts | 19/40 | 7/15 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 47% |
Denolly made 2 aces . Feldbausch fired 2 aces . Denolly won 67% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Feldbausch won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Denolly | Feldbausch |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 6 |
Converted | 7/12 | 6/6 |
% Converted | 58% | 100% |
Conceded | 11 | 4 |
Saved | 8 | 3 |
% Saved | 73% | 75% |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Denolly broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. The Swiss broke his opponent 6 times with a 100% conversion rate. Kilian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Denolly | |||
Q1 Agostini | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
pts | 94-75 | 94-75 | |
Total points | 169 | 169 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
1st in | 51/91 | 51/91 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 19/40 | 19/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Feldbausch | |||
Q1 Jecan | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 51-23 | 51-23 | |
Total points | 74 | 74 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 20/24 | 20/24 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Martin KlizanKlizan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Johan NiklesNikles (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (1-0) – H2H and prediction