Federico Agustin Gomez and Norbert Gombos will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Agustin Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.666
Norbert Gombos -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Norbert Gombos
There is no head to head record between Federico Agustin Gomez and Norbert Gombos since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Federico Agustin Gomez
47 - 19win/loss
138
135
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59-26 | 9-6 | 50-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 182, Agustin Gomez reached the qualifications after defeating Mikalai Haliak 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Haliak, Federico recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 90 points vs Haliak’s 78. Agustin Gomez was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agustin Gomez scored 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Federico Agustin Gomez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Agustin Gomez put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (43/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Haliak 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Agustin Gomez has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (156-79). 3-2 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Agustin Gomez has a compiled47-26 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Milan Challenger where he defeated Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Trieste Challenger where he overcame Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 6-1 6-2.
The Argentine has an aggregate 47-18 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Agustin Gomez has never competed in this tournament before.
Norbert Gombos
20 - 17win/loss
425
80
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-23 | 13-3 | 10-13 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 584, Norbert reached the qualifications after beating Philip Henning 3-6 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications against Henning, Norbert recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 7-5). During the match Gombos scored 84 points vs Henning’s 67. The Slovakian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Gombos struck 8 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Norbert Gombos was pretty effective on serve to win 82% (36/44) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Gombos broke Henning 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Slovakian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Zhangjiagang Challenger.
Norbert has an overall 19-17 win-loss record in 2024, 9-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agustin Gomez | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 28 |
| Pts | 90-78 | 84-67 |
| Total Points | 168 | 151 |
| Winners | 43 | 36 |
| %Winners | 48% | 43% |
Both Agustin Gomez and Gombos played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Agustin Gomez dropped 1 set, while Norbert Gombos conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Agustin Gomez and Gombos have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Agustin Gomez played 1 game more than Gombos. Agustin Gomez scored 43 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Norbert blasted 36 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agustin Gomez | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 8 |
| 1st in | 61/87 | 44/70 |
| %1st in | 70% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 43/61 | 36/44 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 17/26 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 65% |
Agustin Gomez fired 9 aces . Gombos bagged 8 aces . Agustin Gomez won 70% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Gombos won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 57% | 36% |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 63% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Agustin Gomez broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Agustin Gomez dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Norbert broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Gombos conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agustin Gomez | |||
| Q1 Haliak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 90-78 | 90-78 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 61/87 | 61/87 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 43/61 | 43/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Gombos | |||
| Q1 Henning | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 84-67 | 84-67 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 36/44 | 36/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yan BaiBai – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Fajing SunSun (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rigele TeTe – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Jie CuiCui (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Ajeet RaiRai (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction