Benjamin Lock and Max Wiskandt will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benjamin Lock who should win in 3 sets.
Benjamin Lock -> 1.78
Max Wiskandt -> 1.97
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Benjamin Lock vs. Max Wiskandt
There is no head to head record between Benjamin Lock and Max Wiskandt since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Benjamin Lock
40 - 21win/loss
373
314
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-21 | 11-8 | 29-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-32 | 13-16 | 25-11 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-32 | 18-17 | 21-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-30 | 20-18 | 1-5 | 3-6 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-13 | 8-7 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 373, Lock got to the qualifications after defeating Kuzey Cekirge 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Benjamin had a good straight sets win against Cekirge (7-5 6-4). During the match, Lock scored 74 points vs Cekirge’s 64. The was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lock couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Lock was exceptionally effective on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Lock broke Cekirge 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Lock has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (336-239). 11-8 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lock has an aggregate 231-160 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Lock’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Addis Ababa and M25 Arequipa.
Lock has an aggregate 40-21 win-loss record in 2024, 11-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
Max Wiskandt
34 - 21win/loss
534
532
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-21 | 29-15 | 5-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-30 | 43-19 | 8-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2022 | 17-17 | 3-2 | 11-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2021 | 8-13 | 4-4 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 534, Wiskandt reached the qualifications after beating Sarp Agabigun 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Agabigun (6-1 6-1). During the match Wiskandt scored 56 points vs Agabigun’s 31. The German was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Wiskandt scored 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Max Wiskandt was very efficient on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Wiskandt broke Agabigun 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
The German’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Wiskandt has a composed 34-21 win-loss record in 2024, 29-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lock | Wiskandt |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 22 | 14 |
Pts | 74-64 | 56-31 |
Total Points | 138 | 87 |
Winners | 34 | 20 |
%Winners | 46% | 36% |
Both Lock and Wiskandt played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lock and Wiskandt have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lock played 8 games more than Wiskandt. The scored 34 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Wiskandt managed to score 20 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lock | Wiskandt |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 5 |
Avg per match | 0 | 5 |
1st in | 47/66 | 26/38 |
%1st in | 71% | 68% |
1st pts | 34/47 | 20/26 |
%1st pts | 72% | 77% |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 9/12 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 75% |
Lock didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Wiskandt blasted 5 aces . Lock won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Wiskandt won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lock | Wiskandt |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/12 | 5/11 |
% Converted | 25% | 45% |
Conceded | 2 | 0 |
Saved | 1 | 0 |
% Saved | 50% | 0% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Benjamin broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Lock lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Wiskandt broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Wiskandt was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Lock | |||
Q1 Cekirge | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 74-64 | 74-64 | |
Total points | 138 | 138 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 47/66 | 47/66 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 34/47 | 34/47 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Wiskandt | |||
Q1 Agabigun | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 56-31 | 56-31 | |
Total points | 87 | 87 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Richard BerankisBerankis (4-4) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Savva PolukhinPolukhin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Koray KirciKirci – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – (0-0) – H2H and prediction