Jack Draper and Botic Van De Zandschulp will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:00 pm on Grandstand. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 4 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.33
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 3.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Draper vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Jack Draper and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jack Draper
27 - 17win/loss
15
15
LWWWWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 17-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 25 (career-high), Jack reached the 3rd round after defeating Zhizhen Zhang 6-3 6-0 4-0 ret. and Facundo Diaz Acosta 6-4 6-2 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Jack had a good straight sets win against Diaz Acosta (6-4 6-2 6-2). During the match, Draper scored 96 points vs Diaz Acosta’s 67. Jack was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Draper managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jack Draper was extremely efficient on serve to win 89% (34/38) of his 1st serve and 59% (23/39) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Diaz Acosta 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Draper has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 68% of his matches (214-99). 14-8 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Draper has an overall100-41 record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title in Stuttgart where he beat Matteo Berrettini in the final 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
Jack has a compiled 27-17 win-loss record in 2024, 14-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Botic Van De Zandschulp
24 - 24win/loss
80
22
LWWLLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 74, Botic reached the 3rd round after beating Denis Shapovalov 6-4 7-5 6-4 and Carlos Alcaraz 6-1 7-5 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Botic had a good straight sets win against Alcaraz (6-1 7-5 6-4). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 92 points vs Alcaraz’s 73. Van De Zandschulp was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Van De Zandschulp scored 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 66% of his first serves in, winning 78% (49/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (13/32) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Alcaraz 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger and the Luedenscheid Challenger.
Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate 24-24 win-loss record in 2024, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Draper | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 61 |
| Pts | 166-102 | 197-160 |
| Total Points | 268 | 357 |
| Winners | 57 | 90 |
| %Winners | 34% | 46% |
Both Draper and Van De Zandschulp played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Draper has played 1 set more than Van De Zandschulp (7 vs 6). However, it’s interesting to notice that Draper played 16 games less than Van De Zandschulp. The Brit scored 57 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp recorded 90 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Draper | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 1 |
| 1st in | 68/127 | 120/188 |
| %1st in | 54% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 57/68 | 90/120 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 38/59 | 33/68 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 49% |
Draper made 11 aces (5.5 per match). Van De Zandschulp scored 2 aces (1 per match). Draper won 84% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Draper | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 12 |
| Converted | 12/20 | 12/19 |
| % Converted | 60% | 63% |
| Conceded | 5 | 13 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The Brit broke his opponents 12 times with a 60% conversion rate. Jack pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points. Botic broke his opponents 12 times with a 63% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Draper | ||||
| R1 Zhang |
R2 Diaz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 4-0 ret. | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 | 45 | |
| pts | 70-35 | 96-67 | 166-102 | |
| Total points | 105 | 163 | 268 | |
| Winners | 23 | 34 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 35% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/50 | 38/77 | 68/127 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 49% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 34/38 | 57/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 89% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 23/39 | 38/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 59% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 5/10 | 12/20 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 50% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Shapovalov |
R2 Alcaraz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 6-4 | 6-1 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 29 | 61 | |
| pts | 105-87 | 92-73 | 197-160 | |
| Total points | 192 | 165 | 357 | |
| Winners | 41 | 49 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 53% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 57/93 | 63/95 | 120/188 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 66% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 49/63 | 90/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 78% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 13/32 | 33/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 41% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/9 | 12/19 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 67% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 | 13 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 3/5 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 60% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWLW
LWWLLWWWLL Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Tomas MachacMachac – Sebastian KordaKorda (6-4 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Max PurcellPurcell (7-5 6-0 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Zizou BergsBergs (4-6 6-3 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-74 2-6 6-2 7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-3 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-5 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-2 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Arthur FilsFils (7-5 6-73 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (6-4 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Mattia BellucciBellucci (6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (7-62 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-4 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz (6-1 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-4 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Mariano NavoneNavone (6-4 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- David GoffinGoffin – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (6-78 6-3 6-2 7-61) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-2 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Gael MonfilsMonfils (6-4 6-2 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-4 7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-2 6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-3 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Laslo DjereDjere (6-4 6-4 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (6-3 4-6 6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-4 6-1 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-75 0-6 6-4 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Arthur CazauxCazaux (6-4 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Taylor FritzFritz – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-3 7-61 6-1) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Ugo HumbertHumbert (5-7 6-4 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (3-6 6-4 6-4 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (4-6 5-7 6-1 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-1 6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-1 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Tommy PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Tomas MachacMachac (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Daniel EvansEvans (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
