Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Norbert Gombos will face off in the 2^nd round of the Zhangjiagang Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.48
Norbert Gombos -> 2.53

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Norbert Gombos

There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Norbert Gombos since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ranked no. 149 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong got to the 2^nd round after defeating Egor Agafonov 6-3 5-7 6-4.

In the 1^st round, The defeated Agafonov (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 98 points vs Agafonov’s 91. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.

Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 57% of his first serves in, winning 68% (38/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (26/42) on the 2nd serve. The broke Agafonov 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (114-88). 23-17 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate93-63 match record in the last 6 years on hard.

Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.

The has an aggregate 23-24 win-loss record in 2024, 23-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Zhangjiagang Challenger

The has never competed in this tournament before.

Norbert Gombos

Ranked no. 584, Norbert reached the 2^nd round after defeating Qian Sun 6-2 7-6(4), Ye Cong Mo 6-3 6-4 and Yibing Wu 7-5 5-7 6-1.

In the 1^st round, The Slovakian defeated Wu (7-5 5-7 6-1). During the match Gombos scored 111 points vs Wu’s 96. The Slovakian was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.

Talking about serving, Gombos fired 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Norbert Gombos lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Gombos put 55% of his first serves in, winning 73% (38/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (19/43) on the 2nd serve. Norbert broke Wu 7 times after converting 41% of his break points (7/17).

The Slovakian has a composed 17-16 win-loss record in 2024, 7-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Lam Coleman Wong	Gombos
Match played	1	3
Tot Set	3	7
Tot Games	31	71
Pts	98-91	253-205
Total Points	189	458
Winners	38	84
%Winners	39%	33%

Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Gombos competed in 3 matches. Gombos started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 1 set, while Norbert Gombos surrendered 1 set. Lam Coleman Wong has played 4 set(s) less than Gombos (3 vs 7). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 40 games less than Gombos. The scored 38 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Norbert bagged 84 winners (33%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Lam Coleman Wong	Gombos
Aces	7	23
Avg per match	7	7.7
1st in	56/98	115/210
%1st in	57%	55%
1st pts	38/56	84/115
%1st pts	68%	73%
2nd pts	26/42	49/95
%2nd pts	62%	52%

Lam Coleman Wong fired 7 aces . Gombos scored 23 aces (7.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Gombos won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Lam Coleman Wong	Gombos
Won	3	15
Converted	3/6	15/33
% Converted	50%	45%
Conceded	4	19
Saved	2	11
% Saved	50%	58%
Times Broken	2	8

Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Chak dropped his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Gombos broke his opponents 15 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Slovakian conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
	R1 Agafonov	Total
Score	6-3 5-7 6-4
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	31	31
pts	98-91	98-91
Total points	189	189
Winners	38	38
%Winners	39%	39%
SERVE
Aces	7	7
Double Faults	3	3
1st in	56/98	56/98
% 1st in	57%	57%
1st pts	38/56	38/56
% 1st pts	68%	68%
2nd pts	26/42	26/42
% 2nd pts	62%	62%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/6	3/6
Converted %	50%	50%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	2/4	2
Saved %	50%	50%
Times Broken	2	2

Gombos
	Q1 Sun	Q3 Cong	R1 Wu	Total
Score	6-2 7-64	6-3 6-4	7-5 5-7 6-1
Tot Set	2	2	3	7
Tot Games	21	19	31	71
pts	76-60	66-49	111-96	253-205
Total points	136	115	207	458
Winners	25	21	38	84
%Winners	33%	32%	34%	33%
SERVE
Aces	6	10	7	23
Double Faults	2	1	5	8
1st in	36/64	27/51	52/95	115/210
% 1st in	56%	53%	55%	55%
1st pts	25/36	21/27	38/52	84/115
% 1st pts	69%	78%	73%	73%
2nd pts	13/28	17/24	19/43	49/95
% 2nd pts	46%	71%	44%	52%
Breaks
Won	5	3	7	15
Converted	5/11	3/5	7/17	15/33
Converted %	45%	60%	41%	45%
Conceded	6	3	10	19
Saved	3/6	2/3	6/10	11
Saved %	50%	67%	60%	177%
Times Broken	3	1	4	8

Tennis Scores in Zhangjiagang Challenger

• Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
• Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
• Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-2 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
• Fajing SunSun – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-7⁵ 6-0) – See score progression
• Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Egor AgafonovAgafonov (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
• Jie CuiCui – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Norbert GombosGombos – Yibing WuWu (7-5 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
• Ryan PenistonPeniston – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Sheng TangTang – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-6⁵ 6-3) – See score progression
• Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (4-6 7-6¹ 6-2) – See score progression
• Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Lukas PokornyPokorny (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
• Mark LajalLajal – Philip HenningHenning (4-6 7-5 7-6⁵) – See score progression
• Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-2 7-6²) – See score progression
• Tung-Lin WuWu – Yi ZhouZhou (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
• Fajing SunSun – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-7(5) 6-0) – See score progression
• Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Yan BaiBai – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Jie CuiCui – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Sheng TangTang – Fajing SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (0-0) – H2H and prediction