Jonas Forejtek and Daniel Cukierman will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Porto 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jonas Forejtek who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jonas Forejtek is the pick to win this match.
Jonas Forejtek -> 1.41
Daniel Cukierman -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jonas Forejtek vs. Daniel Cukierman
There is no head to head record between Jonas Forejtek and Daniel Cukierman since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jonas Forejtek
35 - 22win/loss
328
217
WLWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-22 | 5-4 | 22-15 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 0-3 | 17-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 32-24 | 3-2 | 14-11 | 14-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 35-31 | 2-2 | 13-18 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2020 | 20-11 | 2-3 | 13-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 328, Jonas got to the 2nd round after defeating Oriol Roca Batalla 6-2 4-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Jonas defeated Roca Batalla (6-2 4-6 7-5). During the match, Forejtek scored 98 points vs Roca Batalla’s 94. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Forejtek scored 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Jonas Forejtek lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Forejtek put 60% of his first serves in, winning 71% (39/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (17/36) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Roca Batalla 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Forejtek has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (171-125). 22-15 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Forejtek has an aggregate93-67 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Jonas’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Esch/Alzette.
The Czech has an aggregate 35-22 win-loss record in 2024, 22-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Porto 2 Challenger
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Cukierman
18 - 14win/loss
541
339
WWWLWLLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-14 | 3-4 | 15-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 541, Daniel got to the 2nd round after beating Francisco Rocha 6-2 6-2, Oleksii Krutykh 6-4 6-3 and Frederico Ferreira Silva 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, The Israeli had a good straight sets win against Ferreira Silva (7-64 7-65). During the match Cukierman scored 96 points vs Ferreira Silva’s 89. Daniel was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Cukierman recorded 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Daniel Cukierman lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cukierman put 64% of his first serves in, winning 63% (37/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (20/33) on the 2nd serve. The Israeli broke Ferreira Silva once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
The Israeli has an overall 18-14 win-loss record in 2024, 15-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Forejtek | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 61 |
| Pts | 98-94 | 217-180 |
| Total Points | 192 | 397 |
| Winners | 39 | 87 |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% |
Forejtek played 1 match while Cukierman competed in 3 matches. Cukierman started his run from the qualifications while Forejtek had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jonas Forejtek dropped 1 set while Daniel Cukierman hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Forejtek has played 3 set(s) less than Cukierman (3 vs 6). Therefore, Forejtek played 31 games less than Cukierman. Jonas scored 39 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Cukierman scored 87 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Forejtek | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 55/91 | 123/202 |
| %1st in | 60% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 87/123 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 43/79 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 54% |
Forejtek scored 3 aces . Cukierman blasted 13 aces (4.3 per match). Forejtek won 71% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Cukierman won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Forejtek | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 9 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 50% | 41% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 57% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jonas dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. Cukierman conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Forejtek | |||
| R1 Roca Batalla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 98-94 | 98-94 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 55/91 | 55/91 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 17/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Cukierman | |||||
| Q1 Rocha |
Q3 Krutykh |
R1 Ferreira Silva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | 7-64 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 19 | 26 | 61 | |
| pts | 60-42 | 61-49 | 96-89 | 217-180 | |
| Total points | 102 | 110 | 185 | 397 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | 37 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 6 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 33/62 | 59/92 | 123/202 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 53% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/33 | 37/59 | 87/123 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 76% | 63% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 14/29 | 20/33 | 43/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 48% | 61% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/6 | 1/8 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 67% | 13% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 50% | 200% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWWLWWWL
WWWLWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Porto 2 Challenger
- Henrique RochaRocha – Yshai OlielOliel (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (6-74 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (4-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marvin MoellerMoeller (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Gastao EliasElias (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-6(4) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marvin MoellerMoeller (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Yshai OlielOliel (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (6-7(4) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (4-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Hady HabibHabib (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-1 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gianluca MagerMager – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Carlos TabernerTaberner (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
