![Prediction And Head To Head Jesper De Jong Vs. Li Tu V5syeix5eo Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Li Tu](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Jesper-De-Jong-vs.-Li-Tu-v5SYEix5EO.jpg)
Jesper De Jong and Li Tu will clash against each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.41
Li Tu -> 2.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Li Tu
There is no head to head record between Jesper De Jong and Li Tu since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jesper De Jong
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Jesper De Jong](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/2125Jesper-De-Jong.jpg)
34 - 18win/loss
130
103
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-18 | 9-3 | 24-12 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 130, Jesper reached the qualifications after beating Gustavo Heide 6-3 6-0 and Denis Yevseyev 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Yevseyev (6-3 6-2). During the match, De Jong scored 59 points vs Yevseyev’s 41. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, De Jong scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Jesper De Jong was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (19/26) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jesper broke Yevseyev 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jesper started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 63% of the points he played.
De Jong has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (239-140). 9-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, De Jong has an aggregate83-38 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Sassuolo Challenger where he overcame Daniel Altmaier in the final 7-6(5) 6-1.
Jesper has an overall 34-18 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Li Tu
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Li Tu](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Li-Tu.jpg)
27 - 19win/loss
188
186
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-19 | 22-13 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 188, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Alejandro Moro Canas 6-4 6-4 and Marco Trungelliti 7-5 7-5.
In the qualifications, Tu had a good straight sets win against Trungelliti (7-5 7-5). During the match Tu scored 79 points vs Trungelliti’s 62. Li was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Tu recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Li Tu lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Tu put 68% of his first serves in, winning 81% (34/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. Tu broke Trungelliti 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Li’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Traralgon and the Lexington Challenger.
Tu has an aggregate 27-19 win-loss record in 2024, 22-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Tu has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | De Jong | Tu |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 32 | 44 |
Pts | 117-70 | 152-118 |
Total Points | 187 | 270 |
Winners | 44 | 67 |
%Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both De Jong and Tu played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, De Jong and Tu have played the same amount of sets 4. However, De Jong played 12 games less than Tu. The Dutch scored 44 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Li scored 67 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | De Jong | Tu |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 13 |
Avg per match | 5 | 6.5 |
1st in | 56/104 | 79/124 |
%1st in | 54% | 64% |
1st pts | 44/56 | 67/79 |
%1st pts | 79% | 85% |
2nd pts | 28/48 | 21/45 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 47% |
De Jong struck 10 aces (5 per match). Tu made 13 aces (6.5 per match). De Jong won 79% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Tu won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | De Jong | Tu |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 7 |
Converted | 9/11 | 7/16 |
% Converted | 82% | 44% |
Conceded | 11 | 11 |
Saved | 9 | 8 |
% Saved | 82% | 73% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Jesper broke his opponents 9 times with a 82% conversion rate. Jesper conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. Li broke his opponents 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Tu conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
De Jong | ||||
Q1 Heide |
Q2 Yevseyev |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 17 | 32 | |
pts | 58-29 | 59-41 | 117-70 | |
Total points | 87 | 100 | 187 | |
Winners | 25 | 19 | 44 | |
%Winners | 43% | 32% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 9 | 1 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
1st in | 30/48 | 26/56 | 56/104 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 46% | 54% | |
1st pts | 25/30 | 19/26 | 44/56 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 73% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 19/30 | 28/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 63% | 58% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 4/5 | 9/11 | |
Converted % | 83% | 80% | 82% | |
Conceded | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 5/6 | 9 | |
Saved % | 80% | 83% | 82% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Tu | ||||
Q1 Moro |
Q2 Trungelliti |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 24 | 44 | |
pts | 73-56 | 79-62 | 152-118 | |
Total points | 129 | 141 | 270 | |
Winners | 33 | 34 | 67 | |
%Winners | 45% | 43% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 37/62 | 42/62 | 79/124 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 68% | 64% | |
1st pts | 33/37 | 34/42 | 67/79 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 81% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 12/25 | 9/20 | 21/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 45% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 4/7 | 7/16 | |
Converted % | 33% | 57% | 44% | |
Conceded | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
Saved | 6/7 | 2/4 | 8 | |
Saved % | 86% | 50% | 68% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Joris De LooreDe Loore (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Alex BoltBolt (7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-2 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (3-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-1 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (3-6 7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-1 3-6 7-610) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Paul JubbJubb (6-3 6-73 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Titouan DroguetDroguet (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Harold MayotMayot (6-2 1-6 7-612) – See score progression
- Diego SchwartzmanSchwartzman – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (1-6 6-2 7-68) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jeff WolfWolf (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Benjamin BonziBonzi (5-7 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-64 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Benjamin BonziBonzi (5-7 7-6(4) 6-1) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Alex BoltBolt (7-6(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-6(4) 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (3-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (3-6 7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-1 4-6 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Titouan DroguetDroguet (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Joris De LooreDe Loore (7-5 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-1 3-6 7-6(10)) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jeff WolfWolf (6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Hugo GrenierGrenier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction