Celine Naef and Mananchaya Sawangkaew will play each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on Court 8. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Celine Naef who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Celine Naef is the pick to win this match.
Celine Naef -> 1.62
Mananchaya Sawangkaew -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Celine Naef vs. Mananchaya Sawangkaew
There is no head to head record between Celine Naef and Mananchaya Sawangkaew since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Celine Naef
19 - 21win/loss
153
121
LWWWWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-28 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 30-13 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 41-19 | 5-3 | 12-6 | 19-8 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-6 | 7-1 | 2-3 | 14-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, Naef reached the qualifications after beating Marina Stakusic 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Celine defeated Stakusic (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match, Naef and Stakusic scored the same amount of points (112). However, the world no. 181 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Celine was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Naef recorded 8 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Celine Naef lost the serve 4 times and she saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Naef put 59% of her first serves in, winning 57% (38/67) of the points behind her 1st serve and 52% (24/46) on the 2nd serve. Celine broke Stakusic 5 times after converting 31% of her break points (5/16).
Naef has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 64% of her matches (89-49). 4-4 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Naef has a composed16-8 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Celine’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the W75 Trnava.
Celine has an overall 19-20 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
34 - 19win/loss
130
129
LWWWLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-28 | 45-22 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 3-2 |
| 2023 | 44-19 | 44-18 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-9 | 25-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 182 (career-high), the Thai reached the qualifications after beating Laura Pigossi 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Mananchaya had a good straight sets win against Pigossi (6-4 6-0). During the match Sawangkaew scored 62 points vs Pigossi’s 43. Mananchaya was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Sawangkaew scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 6 double faults. Mananchaya Sawangkaew lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Sawangkaew put 53% of her first serves in, winning 77% (23/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. The Thai broke Pigossi 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Her best result of the year was conquering the title the W50 Nonthaburi where she overcame Antonia Ruzic in the final 6-1 2-6 6-2.
The Thai has an overall 33-19 win-loss record in 2024, 27-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Sawangkaew has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Naef | Sawangkaew |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 16 |
| Pts | 112-112 | 62-43 |
| Total Points | 224 | 105 |
| Winners | 38 | 23 |
| %Winners | 34% | 37% |
Both Naef and Sawangkaew played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Celine Naef conceded 1 set while Mananchaya Sawangkaew hasn’t lost a set so far. Naef has played 1 set more than Sawangkaew (3 vs 2). Therefore, Naef played 12 games more than Sawangkaew. Celine scored 38 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Mananchaya fired 23 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Naef | Sawangkaew |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 1 |
| 1st in | 67/113 | 30/57 |
| %1st in | 59% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 38/67 | 23/30 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 24/46 | 11/27 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 41% |
Naef managed to score 8 aces . Sawangkaew struck 1 ace . Naef won 57% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Sawangkaew won 77% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Naef | Sawangkaew |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/16 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 31% | 67% |
| Conceded | 16 | 5 |
| Saved | 12 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Celine broke her opponent 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. Naef surrendered her serve 4 times and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded. Sawangkaew broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Sawangkaew conceded her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded.
| Naef | |||
| Q1 Stakusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 112-112 | 112-112 | |
| Total points | 224 | 224 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 67/113 | 67/113 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 38/67 | 38/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/46 | 24/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/16 | 5/16 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 12/16 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Sawangkaew | |||
| Q1 Pigossi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-43 | 62-43 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/57 | 30/57 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 23/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 11/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWWW
LWWWLWWWWL Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Luis BrittoBritto (7-5 4-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sergio BarrancoBarranco – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Giles HusseyHussey – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mason RecciRecci – Arthur BernabeBernabe (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rayane RoumaneRoumane – Simohamed HirsHirs (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo Grassi MazzuchiPablo Grassi Mazzuchi – Cayetano MarchMarch (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxim KrapivinKrapivin – Akram El SallalyEl Sallaly (6-0 0-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Heather WatsonWatson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Destanee AiavaAiava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Ena ShibaharaShibahara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Veronika ErjavecErjavec (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xinyu GaoGao – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Astra SharmaSharma (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hanna ChangChang – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Su Jeong JangJeong Jang – Sijia WeiWei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yexin MaMa – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-1) – H2H and prediction
