Elizabeth Mandlik and Mirjam Bjorklund will face off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Stadium 17. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elizabeth Mandlik who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elizabeth Mandlik is the pick to win this match.
Elizabeth Mandlik -> 1.7
Mirjam Bjorklund -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elizabeth Mandlik vs. Mirjam Bjorklund
There is no head to head record between Elizabeth Mandlik and Mirjam Bjorklund since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Elizabeth Mandlik
13 - 17win/loss
249
97
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-26 | 15-14 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-33 | 15-17 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-24 | 26-12 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-22 | 24-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Elizabeth reached the qualifications after defeating Sara Bejlek 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Bejlek (6-3 6-4). During the match, Mandlik scored 67 points vs Bejlek’s 55. Mandlik was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mandlik fired 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Elizabeth Mandlik lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mandlik put 69% of her first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Mandlik broke Bejlek 4 times after converting 80% of her break points (4/5).
Mandlik has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 56% of her matches (155-121). 6-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Mandlik has an aggregate91-60 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Elizabeth’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the W75 Lexington.
Mandlik has an overall 12-17 win-loss record in 2024, 6-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Mirjam Bjorklund
5 - 8win/loss
760
123
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-17 | 11-9 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-22 | 9-8 | 15-6 | 7-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-20 | 10-10 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 655, Mirjam got to the qualifications after defeating Anastasiia Sobolieva 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Bjorklund had a good straight sets win against Sobolieva (6-4 6-4). During the match Bjorklund scored 74 points vs Sobolieva’s 60. The Swede was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Bjorklund blasted 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Mirjam Bjorklund lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Bjorklund put 69% of her first serves in, winning 65% (31/48) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Bjorklund broke Sobolieva 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Bjorklund has an overall 5-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mandlik | Bjorklund |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
Pts | 67-55 | 74-60 |
Total Points | 122 | 134 |
Winners | 32 | 31 |
%Winners | 48% | 42% |
Both Mandlik and Bjorklund played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mandlik and Bjorklund have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mandlik played 1 game less than Bjorklund. The American scored 32 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Swede made 31 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mandlik | Bjorklund |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 2 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
1st in | 47/68 | 48/70 |
%1st in | 69% | 69% |
1st pts | 32/47 | 31/48 |
%1st pts | 68% | 65% |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/22 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 45% |
Mandlik fired 2 aces . Bjorklund recorded 2 aces . Mandlik won 68% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Bjorklund won 65% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mandlik | Bjorklund |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/5 | 5/8 |
% Converted | 80% | 63% |
Conceded | 6 | 6 |
Saved | 4 | 3 |
% Saved | 67% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The American broke her opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Mandlik conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Swede broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Swede conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
Mandlik | |||
Q1 Bejlek |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 67-55 | 67-55 | |
Total points | 122 | 122 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 47/68 | 47/68 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Bjorklund | |||
Q1 Sobolieva |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 74-60 | 74-60 | |
Total points | 134 | 134 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 48/70 | 48/70 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 31/48 | 31/48 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 10/22 | 10/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Mason RecciRecci – Arthur BernabeBernabe (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rayane RoumaneRoumane – Simohamed HirsHirs (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo Grassi MazzuchiPablo Grassi Mazzuchi – Cayetano MarchMarch (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxim KrapivinKrapivin – Akram El SallalyEl Sallaly (6-0 0-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Luis BrittoBritto (7-5 4-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sergio BarrancoBarranco – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Giles HusseyHussey – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Heather WatsonWatson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Destanee AiavaAiava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Ena ShibaharaShibahara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Veronika ErjavecErjavec (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xinyu GaoGao – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Astra SharmaSharma (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hanna ChangChang – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Su Jeong JangJeong Jang – Sijia WeiWei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yexin MaMa – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-1) – H2H and prediction