Sijia Wei and Su Jeong Jang will square off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Court 16. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Su Jeong Jang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Su Jeong Jang is the pick to win this match.
Su Jeong Jang -> 1.88
Sijia Wei -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sijia Wei vs. Su Jeong Jang
There is no head to head record between Sijia Wei and Su Jeong Jang since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Sijia Wei
34 - 14win/loss
134
130
LWWWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-22 | 41-18 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-22 | 29-18 | 6-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-28 | 78-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 153, Wei reached the qualifications after beating Sachia Vickery 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Vickery (6-4 7-5). During the match, Wei scored 80 points vs Vickery’s 72. Wei was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wei managed to score 5 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Sijia Wei lost the serve 4 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Wei put 59% of her first serves in, winning 60% (26/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. Wei broke Vickery 6 times after converting 50% of her break points (6/12).
Wei has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 70% of her matches (155-65). 32-10 on hard in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Wei has an aggregate140-58 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Her best result of the year was conquering the title the W50 Kashiwa where she defeated Ya-Hsuan Lee in the final 6-1 7-5 and the W35 Tianjin where she defeated Hina Inoue in the final 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 and the W75 Lexington where she overcame Mananchaya Sawangkaew in the final 7-5 6-4.
Sijia has an overall 34-13 win-loss record in 2024, 32-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Su Jeong Jang
24 - 12win/loss
263
114
LLWLLWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-19 | 12-14 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-3 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 27-17 | 2-4 | 7-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-20 | 5-8 | 20-8 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-15 | 0-0 | 40-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, Su got to the qualifications after defeating Mona Barthel 5-7 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications against Barthel, Su recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-5 6-2). During the match Jeong Jang scored 109 points vs Barthel’s 102. The Korean was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Jeong Jang bagged 3 aces and she was not very steady on her 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Su Jeong Jang lost the serve 4 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Jeong Jang put 63% of her first serves in, winning 61% (37/61) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the 2nd serve. Jeong Jang broke Barthel 6 times after converting 50% of her break points (6/12).
Jeong Jang’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the W75 Olomouc.
Su has an overall 23-12 win-loss record in 2024, 9-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wei | Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 32 |
| Pts | 80-72 | 109-102 |
| Total Points | 152 | 211 |
| Winners | 26 | 37 |
| %Winners | 33% | 34% |
Both Wei and Jeong Jang played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Su Jeong Jang lost 1 set while Sijia Wei hasn’t conceded a set so far. Wei has played 1 set(s) less than Jeong Jang (2 vs 3). Therefore, Wei played 10 games less than Jeong Jang. The Chinese scored 26 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Jeong Jang made 37 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wei | Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 43/73 | 61/97 |
| %1st in | 59% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 26/43 | 37/61 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 20/36 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 56% |
Wei bagged 5 aces . Jeong Jang fired 3 aces . Wei won 60% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Jeong Jang won 61% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wei | Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 43% | 20% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
The Chinese broke her opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Wei surrendered her serve 4 times and she saved 43% of the break points that she conceded. Jeong Jang broke her opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jeong Jang conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 20% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wei | |||
| Q1 Vickery |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 80-72 | 80-72 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/73 | 43/73 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 14/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Jeong Jang | |||
| Q1 Barthel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 109-102 | 109-102 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 61/97 | 61/97 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 37/61 | 37/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWLWL
LLWLLWLWLL Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Juan Pablo Grassi MazzuchiPablo Grassi Mazzuchi – Cayetano MarchMarch (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxim KrapivinKrapivin – Akram El SallalyEl Sallaly (6-0 0-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Luis BrittoBritto (7-5 4-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sergio BarrancoBarranco – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Giles HusseyHussey – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mason RecciRecci – Arthur BernabeBernabe (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rayane RoumaneRoumane – Simohamed HirsHirs (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Heather WatsonWatson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Destanee AiavaAiava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Ena ShibaharaShibahara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Veronika ErjavecErjavec (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xinyu GaoGao – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Astra SharmaSharma (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hanna ChangChang – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Su Jeong JangJeong Jang – Sijia WeiWei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yexin MaMa – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-1) – H2H and prediction
