Tristan Schoolkate and Learner Tien will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 4:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Learner Tien who should win in 3 sets.
Learner Tien -> 1.52
Tristan Schoolkate -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Learner Tien
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Learner Tien since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
33 - 24win/loss
173
167
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 198, Schoolkate reached the 1st round after defeating Luca Pow 6-0 6-1 and Nicolas Mejia 7-6(7) 7-6(6).
In the qualifications, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Mejia (7-67 7-66). During the match, Schoolkate scored 94 points vs Mejia’s 93. Tristan was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate fired 17 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (48/61) of his 1st serve and 51% (20/39) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Schoolkate started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Schoolkate has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (159-111). 27-16 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Schoolkate has a composed99-71 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he overcame Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Schoolkate has a compiled 33-23 win-loss record in 2024, 27-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Schoolkate has never competed in this tournament before.
Learner Tien
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 60-11 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 232 (career-high), Learner reached the 1st round after beating Andres Martin 7-6(2) 6-3 and Dhakshineswar Suresh 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Tien had a good straight sets win against Suresh (6-3 6-4). During the match Tien scored 63 points vs Suresh’s 46. Learner was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Tien scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Learner Tien was extremely efficient on serve to win 90% (26/29) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tien broke Suresh twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Learner started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Bloomfield Hills Challenger where he beat Nishesh Basavareddy in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Learner has a compiled 36-5 win-loss record in 2024, 36-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Schoolkate | Tien |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 39 | 41 |
Pts | 147-114 | 139-108 |
Total Points | 261 | 247 |
Winners | 63 | 55 |
%Winners | 43% | 40% |
Both Schoolkate and Tien played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Schoolkate and Tien have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Schoolkate played 2 games less than Tien. Tristan scored 63 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Learner made 55 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Schoolkate | Tien |
---|---|---|
Aces | 22 | 5 |
Avg per match | 11 | 2.5 |
1st in | 78/132 | 71/109 |
%1st in | 59% | 65% |
1st pts | 63/78 | 55/71 |
%1st pts | 81% | 77% |
2nd pts | 30/54 | 23/38 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 61% |
Schoolkate scored 22 aces (11 per match). Tien made 5 aces (2.5 per match). Schoolkate won 81% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Tien won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Schoolkate | Tien |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 7 |
Converted | 6/15 | 7/17 |
% Converted | 40% | 41% |
Conceded | 7 | 4 |
Saved | 7 | 1 |
% Saved | 100% | 25% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Australian broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Australian quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 7 break points. The American broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
Schoolkate | ||||
Q1 Pow | Q3 Mejia | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-1 | 7-67 7-66 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 26 | 39 | |
pts | 53-21 | 94-93 | 147-114 | |
Total points | 74 | 187 | 261 | |
Winners | 15 | 48 | 63 | |
%Winners | 28% | 51% | 43% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 17 | 22 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
1st in | 17/32 | 61/100 | 78/132 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 61% | 59% | |
1st pts | 15/17 | 48/61 | 63/78 | |
% 1st pts | 88% | 79% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 10/15 | 20/39 | 30/54 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 51% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/12 | 0/3 | 6/15 | |
Converted % | 50% | 0% | 40% | |
Conceded | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 7/7 | 7 | |
Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tien | ||||
Q1 Martin | Q3 Suresh | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 41 | |
pts | 76-62 | 63-46 | 139-108 | |
Total points | 138 | 109 | 247 | |
Winners | 29 | 26 | 55 | |
%Winners | 38% | 41% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 42/61 | 29/48 | 71/109 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 60% | 65% | |
1st pts | 29/42 | 26/29 | 55/71 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 90% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 9/19 | 14/19 | 23/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 74% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 2/5 | 7/17 | |
Converted % | 42% | 40% | 41% | |
Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/4 | 0/0 | 1 | |
Saved % | 25% | – | 13% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Tennis Scores in Salem Open
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Taro DanielDaniel (4-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (6-1 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (6-4 3-6 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James DuckworthDuckworth (3-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Adam WaltonWalton (2-6 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Borna CoricCoric – Sumit NagalNagal (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Daniel EvansEvans (2-6 6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Corentin MoutetMoutet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Borna CoricCoric (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction