Saba Purtseladze and Mirza Basic will play each other in the qualifications of the Dobrich Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mirza Basic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mirza Basic is the pick to win this match.
Mirza Basic -> 1.59
Saba Purtseladze -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Saba Purtseladze vs. Mirza Basic
There is no head to head record between Saba Purtseladze and Mirza Basic since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Saba Purtseladze
29 - 24win/loss
403
395
LLWWLWLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-32 | 25-19 | 9-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-37 | 44-27 | 1-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-35 | 34-26 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-23 | 20-16 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 455, the Georgean got to the qualifications after defeating Valentin Basel 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Georgean had a good straight sets win against Basel (6-4 6-4). During the match, Purtseladze scored 64 points vs Basel’s 53. The Georgean was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Purtseladze was unable to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 6 double faults. Saba Purtseladze lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Purtseladze put 64% of his first serves in, winning 61% (23/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. The Georgean broke Basel 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Purtseladze has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 52% of his matches (149-137). 9-9 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Purtseladze has an aggregate26-46 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Purtseladze’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and the Astana Challenger.
Saba has a compiled 29-23 win-loss record in 2024, 9-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Dobrich Challenger
Saba has never competed in this tournament before.
Mirza Basic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-22 | 4-6 | 21-13 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-19 | 0-1 | 23-12 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 17-29 | 1-6 | 6-11 | 8-9 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-27 | 9-7 | 17-13 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 580, Mirza got to the qualifications after beating Viktor Kirov 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, Mirza had a good straight sets win against Kirov (6-2 6-0). During the match Basic scored 52 points vs Kirov’s 22. Mirza was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Basic wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Mirza Basic was quite efficient on serve to win 95% (18/19) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Bosnian broke Kirov 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Basic’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Sarajevo.
Mirza has a composed 22-15 win-loss record in 2024, 17-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Purtseladze | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 14 |
| Pts | 64-53 | 52-22 |
| Total Points | 117 | 74 |
| Winners | 23 | 18 |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% |
Both Purtseladze and Basic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Purtseladze and Basic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Purtseladze played 6 games more than Basic. The Georgean scored 23 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Basic fired 18 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Purtseladze | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 38/59 | 19/37 |
| %1st in | 64% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 23/38 | 18/19 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 95% |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/18 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 56% |
Purtseladze didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Basic also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Purtseladze won 61% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Basic won 95% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Purtseladze | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 55% | 71% |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 33% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The Georgean broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Purtseladze surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Basic broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Mirza was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Purtseladze | |||
| Q1 Basel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 64-53 | 64-53 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 38/59 | 38/59 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 23/38 | 23/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Basic | |||
| Q1 Kirov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 52-22 | 52-22 | |
| Total points | 74 | 74 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 19/37 | 19/37 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 18/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLLLL
LLWWWWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Yshai OlielOliel (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Christoph NegrituNegritu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Marvin MoellerMoeller (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- David PichlerPichler – Alexander DonskiDonski (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Andrej MartinMartin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
