Greetje Minnen and Ana Bogdan will face off in the qualifications of the Tennis in the Land for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 10:00 am on Stadium Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Greetje Minnen who should win in 3 sets.
Greetje Minnen -> 1.615
Ana Bogdan -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Greetje Minnen vs. Ana Bogdan
This will be the 3rd time that Greetje Minnen and Ana Bogdan clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Bogdan (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Bogdan won 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the semifinal in the W100+H Dubai back in 2019.
Greetje Minnen
20 - 25win/loss
95
59
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-32 | 18-19 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-20 | 12-6 | 13-4 | 22-6 | 5-3 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 19-21 | 0-9 | 2-4 | 10-4 | 2-4 | 5-0 |
| 2021 | 39-27 | 19-12 | 7-6 | 8-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 11-7 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 74, the Belgian got to the qualifications after beating Hina Inoue 6-1 7-6(6).
In the qualifications, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Inoue (6-1 7-66). During the match, Minnen scored 72 points vs Inoue’s 55. Greetje was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Minnen fired 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Greetje Minnen was very effective on serve to win 81% (30/37) of her 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Minnen broke Inoue 3 times after converting 38% of her break points (3/8).
Minnen has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of her matches (338-188). 12-11 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Minnen has an overall 127-75 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Greetje’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Charleston.
Greetje has a compiled 20-24 win-loss record in 2024, 12-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Greetje has never competed in this tournament before.
Ana Bogdan
13 - 18win/loss
114
39
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-24 | 11-12 | 5-9 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 5-9 | 17-7 | 2-2 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-17 | 4-3 | 20-8 | 11-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-19 | 7-7 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-8 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 103, the Romanian got to the qualifications after beating Shelby Rogers 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Romanian defeated Rogers (7-64 4-6 6-1). During the match Bogdan scored 116 points vs Rogers’s 111. The Romanian was extremely aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Bogdan fired 11 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Ana Bogdan lost the serve 4 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Bogdan put 64% of her first serves in, winning 63% (48/76) of the points behind her 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Rogers 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Bogdan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in Napoca.
Bogdan has an overall 12-18 win-loss record in 2024, 3-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Minnen | Bogdan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 30 |
| Pts | 72-55 | 116-111 |
| Total Points | 127 | 227 |
| Winners | 30 | 48 |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% |
Both Minnen and Bogdan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ana Bogdan dropped 1 set while Greetje Minnen hasn’t conceded a set so far. Minnen has played 1 set(s) less than Bogdan (2 vs 3). Therefore, Minnen played 10 games less than Bogdan. Minnen scored 30 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Bogdan fired 48 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Minnen | Bogdan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 11 |
| 1st in | 37/61 | 76/119 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 48/76 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 21/43 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 49% |
Minnen scored 2 aces . Bogdan made 11 aces . Minnen won 81% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Bogdan won 63% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Minnen | Bogdan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 38% | 42% |
| Conceded | 3 | 13 |
| Saved | 2 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Belgian broke her opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Minnen conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Romanian broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Ana conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 69% of the break points that she conceded.
| Minnen | |||
| Q1 Inoue | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/61 | 37/61 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 30/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bogdan | |||
| Q1 Rogers | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 116-111 | 116-111 | |
| Total points | 227 | 227 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 76/119 | 76/119 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 48/76 | 48/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 21/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 9/13 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Cleveland
- Naoki TakedaTakeda – Stefan VujicVujic (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Paramveer Singh BajwaSingh Bajwa – Yash ChaurasiaChaurasia (6-0 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Emily AppletonAppleton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Ana BogdanBogdan (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Eudice Wong ChongWong Chong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Bernarda PeraPera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Sofia KeninKenin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Yafan WangWang (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Lauren DavisDavis (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Diane ParryParry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction